Dne 12. 03. 20 v 6:21 Chris Murphy napsal(a):
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:30 AM Daniel Mach wrote:
Dne 04. 03. 20 v 23:01 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:37 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
Are you going to use sd-bus for the dbus library?
I'd hope not, given that we
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 08:22:48AM +0100, Daniel Mach wrote:
>
>
> Dne 12. 03. 20 v 6:21 Chris Murphy napsal(a):
> >On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:30 AM Daniel Mach wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Dne 04. 03. 20 v 23:01 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> >>>On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:37 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 15:26, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 32 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> sudo dnf modu
On Thursday, 12 March 2020 09.03.38 WET Carlos "casep" Sepulveda wrote:
> Error:
> Problem 1: package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.4_136177_fedora31-1.x86_64
> requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed
> - python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
Hi,
thanks for the update, it seems nice progress is being made.
> ### Dist-git tests support multipackage updates
>
> You can define package tests in dist-git via STR format
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/standard-test-roles/
The docs have a "Quick Start Guide", but it describes a
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 09:22:45AM +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Thursday, 12 March 2020 09.03.38 WET Carlos "casep" Sepulveda wrote:
> > Error:
> > Problem 1: package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.4_136177_fedora31-1.x86_64
> > requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed
>
On 12. 03. 20 10:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
There's a mention somewhere that this destructively modifies the host
machine, and using a VM is suggested. But not in the "Quick Start
Guide". I'd expect this to be prominently mentioned at the top.
This together with:
Simply following
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 08:57:46AM -0500, Tom Callaway wrote:
> Wait, I know that $TOPIC is scary, come back.
>
> Chromium has this chunk of code (in
> third_party/angle/src/common/PackedEnums.h):
>
> // This horrible const_cast pattern is necessary to work
> around a constexpr limit
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module
libgit2:0.27:3120190407181414:f636be4b-0.x86_64
Error:
Problem 1: package python2-matplotlib-2.2.5-1.fc31.x86_64 requires
python2-backports-functools_lru_cache, but none of the providers can be
installed
Hi all,
The recent update to libwebsockets 4.0.0 has introduced an SONAME bump
(like in $SUBJECT). Dependent packages have not been rebuilt. This is
affecting at least:
- guacamole-server
- mosquitto
- qpid-dispatch
- vdr-osd2web
Please coordinate the necessary rebuilds with the maintainers of t
Hi all,
I'm working on updating the gssdp and gupnp stack in rawhide from 1.0.x
to 1.2.x. This brings a bunch of API changes and dependent packages need
rebuilds/version bumps to be able to continue building against new gupnp.
I'll rebuild and update most of the dependent packages, but some a
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200308.0):
ID: 542526 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/542526
ID: 542527 Test:
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 32 Candidate Beta-1.2 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the cu
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 14/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200311.n.0):
ID: 542386 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic
URL: https://o
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200311.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200312.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:13
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 89
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 7.59 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:46 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> thanks for the update, it seems nice progress is being made.
>
> > ### Dist-git tests support multipackage updates
> >
> > You can define package tests in dist-git via STR format
> >
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.o
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200311.0):
ID: 542772 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/542772
Soft failed openQ
Hi,
the build of speed-dreams on s390x arch fails [1] with
DEBUG util.py:598: speed-dreams-1:2.2.2-6.fc33
DEBUG util.py:596: error: unpacking of archive failed on file
/builddir/build/SOURCES/speed-dreams-src-wip-cars-and-tracks-2.2.2-r6553.t
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 02:58:02PM -, Martin Gansser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the build of speed-dreams on s390x arch fails [1] with
>
> DEBUG util.py:598: speed-dreams-1:2.2.2-6.fc33
>
> DEBUG util.py:596: error: unpacking of archive failed on fi
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:58:02 -
"Martin Gansser" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the build of speed-dreams on s390x arch fails [1] with
>
> DEBUG util.py:598: speed-dreams-1:2.2.2-6.fc33
> DEBUG util.py:596: error:
> unpack
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 03:30:18PM +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:46 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > thanks for the update, it seems nice progress is being made.
> >
> > > ### Dist-git tests support multipackage updates
> > >
> > > Y
On 3/12/20 13:28, Kalev Lember wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working on updating the gssdp and gupnp stack in rawhide from 1.0.x
to 1.2.x. This brings a bunch of API changes and dependent packages need
rebuilds/version bumps to be able to continue building against new gupnp.
I'll rebuild and update mo
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/160 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 542611 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/542611
ID: 542661 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_background
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/54266
Hi All,
I would like to join the Fedora community for open-source software development.
I do not have much experience in open-sourcing development, but I am using a
lot of open-source software, and have >20 years of software development.
I just submitted one new Fedora package: OpenOSC, an open
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020, Yongkui Han (yonhan) via devel wrote:
There is one minor problem with my package review request: I would like to
set the blocks for 177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=FE-NEEDSPONSOR, however, I tried
a few times, could not make my review request get the green
I realize I'm thinking about the Pie in the Sky, but:
Would it be possible for 'microdnf' to become the base for 'dnf' so
that extra 'dnf' functionality is added via some kind of
modules/plugins/etc behaviour? Perhaps "somehow" it could (for
example) find out "oh I've got python, lets load those
The release status of Fedora 32 Beta is no-go.
Due to an open previous release blocker and insufficient test
coverage, Fedora 32 Beta was declared "no-go". We will reconvene at
1800 UTC (note the departure from the usual time) on Friday, 13
March[1] to re-evaluate the existing release candidate.
On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 11:33:04PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> It is very, very wrong and I don't feel I should have to make a public
> request like this. Nonetheless, there is a certain type of person who
Daniel, to request re-instatement, please follow the process outlined
in the original cod
OLD: Fedora-32-20200310.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200312.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 1
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-32-20200310.n.0):
ID: 543391 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/543391
ID: 543441 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_
> OK, I'm all done with the gupnp stack updates and everything is merged
> into rawhide now. All dependent packages are rebuilt/fixed, with the
> exception of 'meiga' (maintainers CC'd). I'm not going to fix meiga
> myself as it looks like a dead package to me. My recommendation for the
> maintaine
Dne 12. 03. 20 v 19:26 Pat Riehecky napsal(a):
I realize I'm thinking about the Pie in the Sky, but:
Would it be possible for 'microdnf' to become the base for 'dnf' so
that extra 'dnf' functionality is added via some kind of
modules/plugins/etc behaviour? Perhaps "somehow" it could (for
exampl
33 matches
Mail list logo
