Il 25/05/24 4:36 PM, Michael Catanzaro ha scritto:
>> 2. I came across jgrulich's pull request for the Chromium package
>> that proposes using dlopen with OpenH264 (
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chromium/pull-request/29
>> ). I also
>> found a WebRTC changelist addressing a similar issue
Hey All,
I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 6.9
Test week is happening from 2024-05-26 to 2024-06-02. It's
fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in detail about the
test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your
results.
As usual, the
Welcome to Fedora!
On Sat, May 25, 2024, 09:37 Jose Fernandez wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm Jose. I work at Netflix on the Compute Runtime team. We manage the
> multi-tenant container runtime and the base OS (Ubuntu-based). My expertise
> is in observability, performance, and reliability. My curren
> Hello, Josh try making an issue in packager-sponsors as well
> https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue
Thank you for the suggestion. I found a sponsor via the issue tracker.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe se
On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 12:18 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The Multimedia SIG has been working on rebasing GStreamer from 1.22 to
> 1.24 in Fedora 40.
The update has now been submitted to bodhi:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-2aa4a3bbf0
I've set high limits for
On 25-05-2024 16:56, Leigh Scott wrote:
ffmpeg
Two more packages depend on it currently:
$ fedrq wrsrc -Xs noopenh264
ffmpeg-6.1.1-13.fc41.src
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.24.3-1.fc41.src
qt6-qtwebengine-6.7.1-1.fc41.src
-- Sandro
--
___
devel mai
Hello, Josh try making an issue in packager-sponsors as well
https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue
Original Message
On 5/25/24 18:06, Jose Fernandez wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm Jose. I work at Netflix on the Compute Runtime team. We manage the
> multi-tenant container
ffmpeg
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ffmpeg/c/db2acb3681a85baed6bbc897cdac792d4b7d7c5f?branch=rawhide
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Con
On Sat, May 25 2024 at 12:55:05 PM +00:00:00, Byoungchan Lee via devel
wrote:
Is my understanding correct?
Yes!
That said, we're considering adding the Firefox plugin as well [1] so
we can finally make Firefox support OpenH264 without requiring user
intervention [2].
[1] https://gitlab
Hi folks,
I'm Jose. I work at Netflix on the Compute Runtime team. We manage the
multi-tenant container runtime and the base OS (Ubuntu-based). My expertise
is in observability, performance, and reliability. My current focus is on
container technology, the Linux kernel, CPU schedulers, and eBPF.
Understanding noopenh264 in Fedora
Hello,
as a software engineer who are working on multimedia applications, and a Fedora
user, I have some questions about how noopenh264 is used in Fedora. Here's what
I've gathered so far:
1. Patent-encumbered codecs like H.264 are a challenge for the FOSS co
Hi all,
The Multimedia SIG has been working on rebasing GStreamer from 1.22 to
1.24 in Fedora 40.
We requested an exception to the Updates Policy, which was granted by FESCo:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3204
This ticket also has more background why updating from 1.22 to 1.24 is
desirable.
The
12 matches
Mail list logo