Re: Declining package maintenance requests? (Was Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26)

2016-02-22 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "FAL" == Fabio Alessandro Locati writes: FAL> If a person is not able to make a click in 7 days (maybe vacation FAL> periods could be excluded from the count), why should he be able to FAL> do so in the following 21 days? I think that a better question is: If a maintainer is not able to d

Re: Declining package maintenance requests? (Was Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26)

2016-02-21 Thread Fabio Alessandro Locati
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 01:58:55PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/21/2016 11:44 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > > >Now, I think that it makes sense to have the POC/Package Admins able to > >approve and/or decline requests. I think the following 3 improvements > >would greatly improve th

Re: Declining package maintenance requests? (Was Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26)

2016-02-21 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jonathan Underwood wrote: > My personal opinion is that (with a few possible exceptions, perhaps > critical path, or a subset of that), co-maintainership requests > shouldn't ever be turned down. That's really not in the spirit of > Fedora. Which makes me wonder why, for most packages, we even need

Re: Declining package maintenance requests? (Was Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26)

2016-02-21 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 02/21/2016 11:44 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: Now, I think that it makes sense to have the POC/Package Admins able to approve and/or decline requests. I think the following 3 improvements would greatly improve the ACL request experience: - auto-accept the ACL requests after 7 days of n

Re: Declining package maintenance requests? (Was Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26)

2016-02-21 Thread Jonathan Underwood
On 21 February 2016 at 10:44, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:10:53AM +, Jonathan Underwood wrote: >> This jumped out at me as particularly worrisome: >> >> On 19 February 2016 at 19:15, Fabio Alessandro Locati >> wrote: >> > If Christopher will not respond, I can

Re: Declining package maintenance requests? (Was Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26)

2016-02-21 Thread Fabio Alessandro Locati
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:10:53AM +, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > This jumped out at me as particularly worrisome: > > On 19 February 2016 at 19:15, Fabio Alessandro Locati > wrote: > > If Christopher will not respond, I can take care of: > [snip] > > Also I can help with the i3 packages as I

Declining package maintenance requests? (Was Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26)

2016-02-21 Thread Jonathan Underwood
This jumped out at me as particularly worrisome: On 19 February 2016 at 19:15, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > If Christopher will not respond, I can take care of: [snip] > Also I can help with the i3 packages as I volounteered few weeks ago and > have been shot down by Christopher becase "no mo