From devel@lists.fedoraproject.org:
FWIW, AFAICT the current state of this is that we had some F27
modular composes that 'succeeded' (the last being 20170831.n.0), but
none of them contained any images at all. Since 20170831.n.0, the
compose has failed each day, apparently due to
https:/
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> From devel@lists.fedoraproject.org:
>
> FWIW, AFAICT the current state of this is that we had some F27
> modular composes that 'succeeded' (the last being 20170831.n.0), but
> none of them contained any images at all. Since 20170831.n.0
On 08/09/17 15:43, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
We're getting to crunch time, here. Should we:
a) scramble to get these things in place
b) postpone the change until F28 (Release Modular Server as another
Boltron?)
c) ask FESCo to d
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 08/09/17 15:43, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We're getting to crunch time, here. Should we:
>>>
>>>a) scramble to get these things in place
>>>b) postpone the change unti
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 08/09/17 15:43, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We're getting to crunch time, here. Should we:
>>>
>>>a) scramble to get these things in place
>>>b) postpone the change until
On 09/08/2017 10:51 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> Surely (c) would make a mockery of change system. What would not make a
> mockery of the change system would be to invoke the contingency plan.
>
> Except there doesn't seem to be one:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Modular_Server#Contingenc
On 8 September 2017 at 16:04, Randy Barlow
wrote:
> On 09/08/2017 10:51 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > Surely (c) would make a mockery of change system. What would not make a
> > mockery of the change system would be to invoke the contingency plan.
> >
> > Except there doesn't seem to be one:
> >
> >
On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 10:38 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> From devel@lists.fedoraproject.org:
For the record, I believe you meant to link to:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474931
> FWIW, AFAICT the current state of this is that we had some F27
> modular composes that 'succeede
On 09/08/2017 11:14 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
On 8 September 2017 at 16:04, Randy Barlow
mailto:bowlofe...@fedoraproject.org>>
wrote:
On 09/08/2017 10:51 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> Surely (c) would make a mockery of change system. What would not
make a
> mockery of the change sy
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 08:56:29AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 10:38 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > From devel@lists.fedoraproject.org:
> For the record, I believe you meant to link to:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474931
Yes! Sorry, and thank you.
-
On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 11:58 -0400, langdon wrote:
> From mattdm:
>
>Also note that the release blocking images list for F27 does not yet
>even exist, let alone has it been updated for this Change:
>
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/26/ReleaseBlocking (F26 page)
>https://f
11 matches
Mail list logo