On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 1:42 AM Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
>
> The package I need is redhat-lsb-core.
We have no plans to add redhat-lsb-core at this time. Most users are
able to port their software to use the fields in /etc/os-release.
josh
> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 1:57 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
The package I need is redhat-lsb-core.
I built the package, and its dependencies on RHEL 9 from SRPMs
downloaded from an RHEL 8 instance.
I am using a developer subscription of Red Hat.
Thanks
---
Lee
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 1:57 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Kevin Fe
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 07:37:46AM +0200, Branislav Náter wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:15 AM Thomas Stephen Lee
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am trying to request a package for RHEL 9, but I cannot find RHEL
> > >
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 07:37:46AM +0200, Branislav Náter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:15 AM Thomas Stephen Lee
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to request a package for RHEL 9, but I cannot find RHEL
> > under Projects at issues.redhat.com.
> > What is the correct project fo
Hi,
I filed on Bugzilla.
I wondered why there is no such option on issues.redhat.com (Jira ?).
Thanks
---
Lee
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 11:08 AM Branislav Náter wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:15 AM Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to request a package for RHEL
Hi,
I am trying to request a package for RHEL 9, but I cannot find RHEL
under Projects at issues.redhat.com.
What is the correct project for RHEL 9 ?
Thanks
---
Lee
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 11:14 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> Hi Fedora, CentOS, and EPEL Communities!
>
> As part of our continued 3 ye
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 08:06:49PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-03-22 at 11:55 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On the first part: yes, there's a long, slow sunset, but I think
> > realistically we're going to see business-side attention drop significantly,
> > and we'll have corres
On 3/22/22 11:55, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 07:17:16AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> If you mean try having a conversation with the community before
>> something goes into effect... that's what this thread is. Depending
>> on how you count, at least a year in advance if not 3.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 08:06:49PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> There is one thing I worry about here - and maybe we need to take this
> up internally within Red Hat, but whatever - I strongly believe that
> *at a minimum*, going to
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=NNN should show y
On Tue, 2022-03-22 at 11:55 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On the first part: yes, there's a long, slow sunset, but I think
> realistically we're going to see business-side attention drop significantly,
> and we'll have correspondingly worse and worse service. Right now, there are
> basically only
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 07:17:16AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> If you mean try having a conversation with the community before
> something goes into effect... that's what this thread is. Depending
> on how you count, at least a year in advance if not 3.
I was going to reply last week, but last wee
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 2:59 PM Dan Čermák
wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> Adam Williamson writes:
>
> > snip
>
> > That could obviously have pretty significant consequences for Fedora.
> > Bugzilla isn't only an issue tracker for Fedora; we run some
> > significant processes through it, notably the Chan
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:12 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 12:44 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Hi Fedora, CentOS, and EPEL Communities!
> >
> > As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux release
> > cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting to wrap up with t
Hi Adam,
Adam Williamson writes:
> snip
> That could obviously have pretty significant consequences for Fedora.
> Bugzilla isn't only an issue tracker for Fedora; we run some
> significant processes through it, notably the Change process, the
> blocker/FE bug process, and the prioritized bug pr
On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 12:44 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hi Fedora, CentOS, and EPEL Communities!
>
> As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux release
> cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting to wrap up with the spring
> 2022 release coming soon. That means planning for the n
On Sat, 2022-03-12 at 10:15 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Simo Sorce:
>
> > On Fri, 2022-03-11 at 13:52 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:45 AM Colin Walters
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Long term if Bugzilla slowly morphs into only being used by
> > > > > Fedora,
> >
* Simo Sorce:
> On Fri, 2022-03-11 at 13:52 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:45 AM Colin Walters
>> > wrote:
>> > > Long term if Bugzilla slowly morphs into only being used by
>> > > Fedora,
>> > > personally I'd prefer to have bugs/issues in gitlab instead.
>> >
>> >
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:51 AM Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 09:44 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2022, at 12:44 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > Hi Fedora, CentOS, and EPEL Communities!
> > >
> > > As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux
> > >
On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 11:51 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Given how we use bugzilla (we do not really use any big feature there)
Uhhh! Whoah! Yes, we certainly do!
I think people may be underestimating how much of Bugzilla we use.
Replacing it would *certainly* not be a drop-in operation.
We use th
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 01:52:53PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:45 AM Colin Walters wrote:
> > > Long term if Bugzilla slowly morphs into only being used by Fedora,
> > > personally I'd prefer to have bugs/issues in gitlab instead.
> >
> > Yes, I personally think gitl
On Fri, 2022-03-11 at 13:52 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:45 AM Colin Walters
> > wrote:
> > > Long term if Bugzilla slowly morphs into only being used by
> > > Fedora,
> > > personally I'd prefer to have bugs/issues in gitlab instead.
> >
> > Yes, I personally think
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022, at 04:55, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Josh Boyer:
>
>> As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux release
>> cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting to wrap up with the spring
>> 2022 release coming soon. That means planning for the next release
>> will sta
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022, 8:53 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:45 AM Colin Walters
> wrote:
> > > Long term if Bugzilla slowly morphs into only being used by Fedora,
> > > personally I'd prefer to have bugs/issues in gitlab instead.
> >
> > Yes, I personally think gitlab.com w
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 02:34:29PM +0100, mkol...@redhat.com wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-03-11 at 08:59 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 01:41:15PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 19:28 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Thursday
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:45 AM Colin Walters wrote:
> > Long term if Bugzilla slowly morphs into only being used by Fedora,
> > personally I'd prefer to have bugs/issues in gitlab instead.
>
> Yes, I personally think gitlab.com would be a good replacement for
> src.fedoraproject.org and bugzill
On Fri, 2022-03-11 at 08:59 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 01:41:15PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 19:28 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> > wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 17:51, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > Also I always
* Josh Boyer:
> As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux release
> cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting to wrap up with the spring
> 2022 release coming soon. That means planning for the next release
> will start in earnest in the very near future. As some of you may
> k
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 01:41:15PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 19:28 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 17:51, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Also I always resented that I need two separate accounts to deal with
> > > Fedora pack
On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 19:28 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 17:51, Simo Sorce wrote:
> [...]
> > Also I always resented that I need two separate accounts to deal with
> > Fedora packages,
>
> It's been possible to log in with FAS credentials (automatica
On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 17:51, Simo Sorce wrote:
[...]
> Also I always resented that I need two separate accounts to deal with
> Fedora packages,
It's been possible to log in with FAS credentials (automatically if you
have an active Kerberos ticket) into bugzilla for quite some time now.
I s
On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 09:44 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2022, at 12:44 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Hi Fedora, CentOS, and EPEL Communities!
> >
> > As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux
> > release
> > cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting to wrap up wi
On 10. 03. 22 17:33, Ben Cotton wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:45 AM Colin Walters wrote:
Long term if Bugzilla slowly morphs into only being used by Fedora, personally
I'd prefer to have bugs/issues in gitlab instead.
I'm not sure how active the use of Red Hat Bugzilla is outside of the
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:45 AM Colin Walters wrote:
>
> Long term if Bugzilla slowly morphs into only being used by Fedora,
> personally I'd prefer to have bugs/issues in gitlab instead.
I'm not sure how active the use of Red Hat Bugzilla is outside of the
distribution space. I have no concerns
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:45 AM Colin Walters wrote:
> Long term if Bugzilla slowly morphs into only being used by Fedora,
> personally I'd prefer to have bugs/issues in gitlab instead.
Yes, I personally think gitlab.com would be a good replacement for
src.fedoraproject.org and bugzilla.redhat.co
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 5:05 PM Davide Cavalca via CentOS-devel
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 12:44 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Hi Fedora, CentOS, and EPEL Communities!
> >
> > As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux
> > release
> > cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022, at 12:44 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hi Fedora, CentOS, and EPEL Communities!
>
> As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux release
> cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting to wrap up with the spring
> 2022 release coming soon. That means planning for the n
On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 12:44 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hi Fedora, CentOS, and EPEL Communities!
>
> As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux
> release
> cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting to wrap up with the spring
> 2022 release coming soon. That means planning for the
Hi Fedora, CentOS, and EPEL Communities!
As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux release
cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting to wrap up with the spring
2022 release coming soon. That means planning for the next release
will start in earnest in the very near future. As
38 matches
Mail list logo
