On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 14:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Sure, I can probably pick one up. I don't have any unassigned right
> now but I'll settle for finishing up OpenImageIO[1] :)
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720411
>
>
I'm just finishing up with
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Would any one like to swap reviews :)?
>
> These two are *very very* simple packages that need to be reviewed.
> They're holding up xmedcon[1]
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714327
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho
Hello,
Would any one like to swap reviews :)?
These two are *very very* simple packages that need to be reviewed.
They're holding up xmedcon[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714327
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714326
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
Hello,
Fedora ships WindowMaker and some *.box windowmanagers which are able to
use WindowMaker applets. But it lacks of them, that's why I've build
some packages. Here is a list:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Fedora&version=rawhide&component=Package+Revi
On 06/15/2011 04:03 PM, Ian Weller wrote:
> 712562 Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-deviantart - the deviantart
>> gnome-shell theme
>> 712567 Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-ubuntu-ambiance - the
>> ubuntu-ambiance gnome-shell theme
Yeah, both of these should really be renamed. The tron one wa
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 03:18:28PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 06/15/2011 08:39 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
> > 712566 Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-tron-legacy - the tron-legacy
> > gnome-shell theme
>
> This is a pretty clear trademark infringement concern. I'm about to go
> block
> On 06/15/2011 08:39 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
>> 712566 Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-tron-legacy - the tron-legacy
>> gnome-shell theme
>
> This is a pretty clear trademark infringement concern. I'm about to go
> block this as FE-Legal, but you should come up with a different name.
On 06/15/2011 08:39 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
> 712566 Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-tron-legacy - the tron-legacy
> gnome-shell theme
This is a pretty clear trademark infringement concern. I'm about to go
block this as FE-Legal, but you should come up with a different name.
~tom
==
Hi
I have a number of packages under review, they should be very easy to review
712560 Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-theme-selector -
extension for review & change gnome-shell themes
712561 Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-atolm - the atolm gnome-shell theme
712562 Review Request: gnome-
Hi there!
Could someone please review these tickets? I'll be happy to review their
tickets in return :)
[1] FreeMedForms - An open Electronic Medical Record Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707002
[2] dcm4che - A DICOM implementation in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
Prabin Kumar Datta wrote:
> Hi!
> Currently, more then 3 of my packages are under review request.
> And 4+ packages are already packaged but not submitted for review
> since the dependency packages are not reviewed till now (or some other
> issues).
>
> My packages under review:
> 1. python-timelib
Hi!
Currently, more then 3 of my packages are under review request.
And 4+ packages are already packaged but not submitted for review
since the dependency packages are not reviewed till now (or some other
issues).
My packages under review:
1. python-timelib [1] -> This package is one the dependenc
Hi Jerry,
/*Jerry James */ wrote on 04/28/2011 10:19:39 PM
+0450:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to swap a couple of reviews. My packages:
>
> openfst: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681976
> This is the next chunk of a voice recognition stack (CMU Sphinx) I've
> slowly been pushing into Fed
Hi all,
I'd like to swap a couple of reviews. My packages:
openfst: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681976
This is the next chunk of a voice recognition stack (CMU Sphinx) I've
slowly been pushing into Fedora.
csdp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689039
This is used by
On 03/11/2011 05:07 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I would like to swap reviews. My stalled review requests are:
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652543 - erlang-riak_client
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/680488 - erlang-basho_stats
>
> This review is different - it depends on previous
Hello!
I would like to swap reviews. My stalled review requests are:
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652543 - erlang-riak_client
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/680488 - erlang-basho_stats
This review is different - it depends on previous one (erlang-basho_stats):
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/6525
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been working on packaging lcd4linux (to use together with the digital
> picture frames I also wrote a libgphoto driver for a while ago).
>
> The packaging is complete and now I'm looking for reviewers for the
> following 3 packa
Hi,
I've been working on packaging lcd4linux (to use together with the digital
picture frames I also wrote a libgphoto driver for a while ago).
The packaging is complete and now I'm looking for reviewers for the
following 3 packages. As usual I'll gladly swap a review for a review.
Note that the
Hi Hans.
I'll get this one done for you, can you do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663926
Peter
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a package in need of a review, I'll happily swap another review in
> return:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug
Hi,
I've a package in need of a review, I'll happily swap another review in return:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671883
Bug 671883 - Review Request: v4l-utils - Utilities for video4linux and DVB
devices
Thanks & Regards,
Hans
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
Hello All!
I would like to swap the following review requests with anyone:
* erlang-cluster-info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/671884
* erlang-riak_errr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/672203
Both are quite simple and legally clean (as far as I can see) so it
wont take too much time.
--
With best re
Taking the remaining one: erlang-webmachine.
Here is mine (openresolv):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668153
Jiri
On 01/10/2011 07:30 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All!
>
> I would like to swap reviews. Here are mine ones (all of them are
> Erlang-related):
>
> * erlang-ebloo
Hello Peter,
I have one gnome-guitar (gtk mono based) at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663018
I will take erlang-ebloom and erlang-skerl .
Thanks
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All!
>
> I would like to swap reviews. Here are mine ones (all of them
Hello All!
I would like to swap reviews. Here are mine ones (all of them are
Erlang-related):
* erlang-ebloom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652616
* erlang-skerl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652648
* erlang-luke https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652585
* erlang-webmachine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/65254
Hello All!
I would like to exchange reviews - here is my wish-list (all these
packages are Erlang-related):
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/638909
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/648023
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652585
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652616
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652648
Fee
2010/11/17 Hans de Goede :
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for someone to swap 2 reviews with, I would like to see the
> following reviewed:
>
> cortado - Java media framework:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649781
I'll take this.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing li
Hi,
I'm looking for someone to swap 2 reviews with, I would like to see the
following reviewed:
cortado - Java media framework:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649781
CEGUI library 0.6 for apps which need this specific version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650643
Reg
26.08.2010 18:34, Chen Lei пишет:
> I've have several review requests that have been sitting around for a while
> now. Many of them are new dependencies for existing packages in
> fedora, anyone want to swap?
>
> EmfEngine(new dep for qtiplot 0.9.8.1):
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:34:14PM +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
> I've have several review requests that have been sitting around for a while
> now. Many of them are new dependencies for existing packages in
> fedora, anyone want to swap?
> libqmf (dep for qt-mobility):
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bu
I've have several review requests that have been sitting around for a while
now. Many of them are new dependencies for existing packages in
fedora, anyone want to swap?
EmfEngine(new dep for qtiplot 0.9.8.1):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
libqmf (dep for qt-mobility
On 08/14/2010 02:19 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Matthias Runge
> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> currently I'm looking for a review for two of my packages:
>> lockfile-progs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601115
>> is a dependency of
>> logcheck: ht
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Matthias Runge
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> currently I'm looking for a review for two of my packages:
> lockfile-progs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601115
> is a dependency of
> logcheck: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
>
> liblockfil
Hello all,
currently I'm looking for a review for two of my packages:
lockfile-progs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601115
is a dependency of
logcheck: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
liblockfile (needed for lockfile-progs) is included in rawhide and in
updates-t
Hello,
I have few packages in the review queue and would do a swap with someone
scribus-stable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519135
uboot-mkimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520569
(Fedora/ARM specific, some discussion still needed)
flash-kernel https://bugzilla.redh
501 - 534 of 534 matches
Mail list logo
