Recently (happened today and happened a month ago), whenever I try to run
fedora-review for a Review Request that includes a C/C++ program, the mock
build fails immediately due to gcc/g++ not being able to find the annobin
plugin.
> cc1plus: fatal error: inaccessible plugin file plugin/annobin.s
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 08:15:21PM -, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> Recently (happened today and happened a month ago), whenever I try to run
> fedora-review for a Review Request that includes a C/C++ program, the mock
> build fails immediately due to gcc/g++ not being able to find the annobin
> plu
On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 20:15 +, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> Recently (happened today and happened a month ago), whenever I try to run
> fedora-review for a Review Request that includes a C/C++ program, the mock
> build fails immediately due to gcc/g++ not being able to find the annobin
> plugin.
>
On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 20:15 +, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> Recently (happened today and happened a month ago), whenever I try to
> run fedora-review for a Review Request that includes a C/C++ program,
> the mock build fails immediately due to gcc/g++ not being able to
> find the annobin plugin.
> > c
I had this issue a month ago when reviewing sane-airscan:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859207
Also a week later, when reviewing wev:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860772
And today, when I tried to review spirv-llvm-translator:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 1:43 AM Artur Iwicki wrote:
>
> I had this issue a month ago when reviewing sane-airscan:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859207
> Also a week later, when reviewing wev:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860772
> And today, when I tried to revi
Today I tried reviewing some Python packages:
- x-tile: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861020
- python-iptools: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870907
And the mock build done by fedora-review failed. The error message I got was:
> line XX: fg: no job control
Which means
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:15 AM Artur Iwicki wrote:
>
> Today I tried reviewing some Python packages:
> - x-tile: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861020
> - python-iptools: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870907
>
> And the mock build done by fedora-review failed. The err
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 11:15 AM Artur Iwicki wrote:
>
> Today I tried reviewing some Python packages:
> - x-tile: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861020
> - python-iptools: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870907
>
> And the mock build done by fedora-review failed. The er
> - Do you have custom mock configuration in ~/.config/mock.cfg?
No, I don't even have that file.
> - Are files in /etc/mock/ up-to-date, or are there lots of .rpmnew files?
mock-core-configs is up to date (32.7-1.fc32), there's no .rpmnew files.
> - Does running "mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 cl
On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 10:19 +, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> > - Do you have custom mock configuration in ~/.config/mock.cfg?
> No, I don't even have that file.
>
> > - Are files in /etc/mock/ up-to-date, or are there lots of .rpmnew
> > files?
> mock-core-configs is up to date (32.7-1.fc32), there's
On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 17:09 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 10:19 +, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> > > - Do you have custom mock configuration in ~/.config/mock.cfg?
> > No, I don't even have that file.
> >
> > > - Are files in /etc/mock/ up-to-date, or are there lots of
> > > .rpmn
12 matches
Mail list logo