On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Stanley
Sokolow wrote:
> Mikus,
>
> I've been using the Ubuntu version customized for the XO for a couple of
> days now. (See www.olpcnews.com for info about "Teapot's" XO-customized
> Ubuntu 8.10 release.) It is a little slow compared with my other
> computers,
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 11:44:11AM -0700, Stanley Sokolow wrote:
> Personally, I feel it is a mistake for the OLPC project to continue with the
> concept of the Sugar platform as its exclusive model for an educational
> computer.The Sugar applications (activities) could just as well be run
> fr
Mikus,
I've been using the Ubuntu version customized for the XO for a couple of
days now. (See www.olpcnews.com for info about "Teapot's" XO-customized
Ubuntu 8.10 release.) It is a little slow compared with my other
computers, as expected for a computer running at less than .5 GHz, but much
mo
Disclaimer: This post contains Off-Topic meta discussion
>>> Conclusion:
>>>
>>>fedora-olpc, to be a sucess, needs a much slimmer UI than that
>>>of GNOME.
>>
>> "Success" needs to be defined. Seems to me the OLPC was envisioned
>> mainly for a single-application environment. Except fo