On 17/07/2014 8:47 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 7/16/2014 5:27 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
On 17/07/2014 6:25 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi
in the nios2 tools is too old to build the current RTEMS.
Newer versions provide __DEVOLATILE
Support is in 4.9.x but it is lacking the RTEMS specifics to allo
On 17/07/2014 12:46 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Just passing along.
Sebastian had two patches he wanted to see on the 4.9 branch and
gcc head.
Are there any others?
What issues do we have moving to a 4.9.x release? I recall there being
code generation issues but not the details.
I think there a
On 7/16/2014 5:27 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 17/07/2014 6:25 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> in the nios2 tools is too old to build the current RTEMS.
>> Newer versions provide __DEVOLATILE
> Support is in 4.9.x but it is lacking the RTEMS specifics to allow us to
> built it.
Which parts?
On 17/07/2014 6:25 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi
in the nios2 tools is too old to build the current RTEMS.
Newer versions provide __DEVOLATILE
Support is in 4.9.x but it is lacking the RTEMS specifics to allow us to
built it.
../../../../../rtems/c/src/libchip/network/dwmac-desc-enh.c:814:
Hi
This one looks like the BSP is missing a support function for the shared
benchmark timer code it is using. This results in 90 tests not being
able to link.
powerpc-rtems4.11-gcc -B../../../../../virtex5/lib/ -specs bsp_specs
-qrtems -mcpu=440 -Dppc440 -msoft-float -O2 -g
-fno-keep-inline-funct
Hi
PowerPC/mpc5668g has what appears to be a BSP specific
compilation problem on the head.
../../../../../../../../rtems/c/src/lib/libbsp/powerpc/mpc55xxevb/network/smsc9218i.c:
In function 'smsc9218i_interrupt_init':
../../../../../../../../rtems/c/src/lib/libbsp/powerpc/mpc55xxevb/network/smsc9
Hi
in the nios2 tools is too old to build the current RTEMS.
Newer versions provide __DEVOLATILE
../../../../../rtems/c/src/libchip/network/dwmac-desc-enh.c:814:
warning: implicit declaration of function '__DEVOLATILE'
../../../../../rtems/c/src/libchip/network/dwmac-desc-enh.c:814:
warning: nes
Just passing along.
Sebastian had two patches he wanted to see on the 4.9 branch and
gcc head.
Are there any others?
What issues do we have moving to a 4.9.x release? I recall there being
code generation issues but not the details.
Original Message
Subject:GCC 4.9.1 Re