On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:31 AM, QIAO YANG wrote:
>
> On Jun 23, 2015, at 07:15 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 7:43 AM, QIAO YANG wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> As suggested by gedare, I think using zero length array to represent the
>
> mailbox buffer and tag data is a good way, much
On Jun 23, 2015, at 07:15 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 7:43 AM, QIAO YANG wrote:
Hi,
As suggested by gedare, I think using zero length array to represent the
mailbox buffer and tag data is a good way, much readable, clearer to
abstract the structure of mailbox buffer, tag.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 7:43 AM, QIAO YANG wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As suggested by gedare, I think using zero length array to represent the
> mailbox buffer and tag data is a good way, much readable, clearer to
> abstract the structure of mailbox buffer, tag.
> I've done an attemp, here is the scratch:
>
Hi,
As suggested by gedare, I think using zero length array to represent the
mailbox buffer and tag data is a good way, much readable, clearer to abstract
the structure of mailbox buffer, tag.
I've done an attemp, here is the scratch:
https://github.com/yangqiao/rtems/commit/3ed7e9bde493bdc8e64
