On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 09:00:55AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2016 08:24:50 PST Rolland Dudemaine wrote:
> > I understand that 5.7 has now reached feature freeze, but I would like
> > to ask for an exception for patches that have been pushed a few months
> > ago
On 02.03.2016 18:00, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2016 08:24:50 PST Rolland Dudemaine wrote:
Hi,
I understand that 5.7 has now reached feature freeze, but I would like
to ask for an exception for patches that have been pushed a few months
ago already but never got merge
On quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2016 08:24:50 PST Rolland Dudemaine wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I understand that 5.7 has now reached feature freeze, but I would like
> to ask for an exception for patches that have been pushed a few months
> ago already but never got merged (partially because of the CI woes).
--Original Message-
> From: Development [mailto:development-
> bounces+alexander.blasche=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
> Rolland Dudemaine
> Sent: Wednesday, 2 March 2016 9:07
> To: Liang Qi
> Cc: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] INT
t: Re: [Development] INTEGRITY changes for 5.7
Do you plan to have them in 5.7 release? Current dev branch means 5.8...
On 2 March 2016 at 08:24, Rolland Dudemaine
mailto:roll...@ghs.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I understand that 5.7 has now reached feature freeze, but I would like
to ask for an ex
Do you plan to have them in 5.7 release? Current dev branch means 5.8...
On 2 March 2016 at 08:24, Rolland Dudemaine wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I understand that 5.7 has now reached feature freeze, but I would like
> to ask for an exception for patches that have been pushed a few months
> ago already but
Hi,
I understand that 5.7 has now reached feature freeze, but I would like
to ask for an exception for patches that have been pushed a few months
ago already but never got merged (partially because of the CI woes).
This would cover all the patches with a positive code review status at
https://cod
