Re: [PATCH -next] xen/arm: remove duplicated include from enlighten.c

2013-04-27 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013, Wei Yongjun wrote: > From: Wei Yongjun > > Remove duplicated include. > > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c

[PATCH v5 06/17] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-17 Thread Stefano Stabellini
y #address-cells and #size-cells for the example. Changes in v4: - "xen,xen" should be last as it is less specific; - update reg property using 2 address-cells and 2 size-cells. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org CC: David Vrabel CC: Rob Herr

Re: [PATCH v4 06/24] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-17 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Rob Herring wrote: > On 09/14/2012 09:26 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:13:08PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >>> Add a doc to describe th

Re: [PATCH v4 06/24] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-14 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:13:08PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings > > > > > > Changes in v4: > > > > - "xen,xen" should be last

[PATCH v4 06/24] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-14 Thread Stefano Stabellini
Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings Changes in v4: - "xen,xen" should be last as it is less specific; - update reg property using 2 address-cells and 2 size-cells. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org CC: David Vrabel CC: R

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-13 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Rob Herring wrote: > On 09/12/2012 01:14 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote: > >>> You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings. &

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-13 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Dave Martin wrote: > Do you think it's feasible to standardise on some interoperable ABI for > kvm and Xen? This sounds pretty optimistic, but I'm not aware of all > the technicalities, or what possible third-party hypervisors are out > there. > > If we could do it, it would

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-13 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Dave Martin wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:14:58PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > - hcall-instructions > > potentially interesting, but given that for Xen we are quite happy with > > HVC,

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-12 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote: > > You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings. > > While it is a PPC doc, we should reuse or extend what makes sense. > > > > See section 7.5: >

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-12 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote: > On 08/16/2012 10:35 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini > > CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org > > CC: David Vrabel >

[PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-08-16 Thread Stefano Stabellini
Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org CC: David Vrabel --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/xen.txt | 22 ++ 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode