On Sat, 27 Apr 2013, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun
>
> Remove duplicated include.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun
Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini
> arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
y #address-cells and #size-cells for the example.
Changes in v4:
- "xen,xen" should be last as it is less specific;
- update reg property using 2 address-cells and 2 size-cells.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
CC: David Vrabel
CC: Rob Herr
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 09/14/2012 09:26 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:13:08PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> Add a doc to describe th
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:13:08PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings
> >
> >
> > Changes in v4:
> >
> > - "xen,xen" should be last
Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings
Changes in v4:
- "xen,xen" should be last as it is less specific;
- update reg property using 2 address-cells and 2 size-cells.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
CC: David Vrabel
CC: R
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 09/12/2012 01:14 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>> You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings.
&
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Dave Martin wrote:
> Do you think it's feasible to standardise on some interoperable ABI for
> kvm and Xen? This sounds pretty optimistic, but I'm not aware of all
> the technicalities, or what possible third-party hypervisors are out
> there.
>
> If we could do it, it would
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:14:58PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > - hcall-instructions
> > potentially interesting, but given that for Xen we are quite happy with
> > HVC,
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
> > You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings.
> > While it is a PPC doc, we should reuse or extend what makes sense.
> >
> > See section 7.5:
>
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 08/16/2012 10:35 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
> > CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
> > CC: David Vrabel
>
Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
CC: David Vrabel
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/xen.txt | 22 ++
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode
11 matches
Mail list logo