I meant that more as a question than a statement. But if the horse is starting
to die I'll avoid beating it.
On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 07:23:42 +
Ximin Luo wrote:
> Agreed; maven is better than our current build scripts in every other respect,
> but we MUST NOT use it until secure downloads are i
On Thursday 28 Feb 2013 14:34:58 Michael Grube wrote:
> I haven't had too much time to think about this. How would centralized
> reporting work? Seems like a malicious person could have a bunch of nodes
> join and simply report bad stats.
Right, sorry. What I meant was we might have the "canary" n
I haven't had too much time to think about this. How would centralized
reporting work? Seems like a malicious person could have a bunch of nodes
join and simply report bad stats.
Just my feedback. I'll try to have some kind of decent response in the next
24 hours.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 9:31 AM,
On Wednesday 27 Feb 2013 19:40:49 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 Feb 2013 18:54:34 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > operhiem1's graphs of probed total datastore size have been attacked
> > recently by nodes returning bogus store sizes (in the multi-petabyte
> > range). This caused a sudden
On 14/02/13 12:42, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Organisations can apply from 18-29 of March.
>
> We have at least one very enthusiastic student (voxsim) who's been working
> with us with a view to participating. However he will need a mentor. I don't
> have time to be primary mentor to anyone this
