On 07/08/2013 09:04 PM, Flamaros wrote:
> http://herbsutter.com/2013/02/11/atomic-weapons-the-c-memory-model-and-modern-hardware/
>
>
> Is D and DMD aware of those kind of issues with atomic?
OT: How does he change slides? I can't see a clicker nor a sign for
somebody off camera?
On Jul 8, 2013, at 5:05 PM, Marco Leise wrote:
> Fortunately on x86
> architectures at least, atomic operations are pretty sane and
> fast.
The x86 memory model is sufficiently strict that, by and large, simple
concurrent interactions actually work without any memory barriers at all. I've
nev
On Jul 8, 2013, at 12:04 PM, Flamaros wrote:
> http://herbsutter.com/2013/02/11/atomic-weapons-the-c-memory-model-and-modern-hardware/
>
> Is D and DMD aware of those kind of issues with atomic?
I think more thought needs to be given to how the compiler recognizes and
treats atomic o
Am Mon, 08 Jul 2013 21:04:01 +0200
schrieb "Flamaros" :
> http://herbsutter.com/2013/02/11/atomic-weapons-the-c-memory-model-and-modern-hardware/
>
> Is D and DMD aware of those kind of issues with atomic?
I haven't looked into the talk, but I can say this: D offers
atom
http://herbsutter.com/2013/02/11/atomic-weapons-the-c-memory-model-and-modern-hardware/
Is D and DMD aware of those kind of issues with atomic?
