My worst kept secret is out.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTk2NA
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> My worst kept secret is out.
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTk2NA
>
:D x 1000
On Wednesday, October 05, 2011 03:50:35 Iain Buclaw wrote:
> My worst kept secret is out.
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTk2NA
*Sigh* They gave the link to the old site rather than the d-programming-
language.org, and since www.digitialmars.com only redirects on the main
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 05, 2011 03:50:35 Iain Buclaw wrote:
> > My worst kept secret is out.
> >
> > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTk2NA
>
> *Sigh* They gave the link to the old site rather than the d-programming-
> la
On 2011-10-05 05:50, Iain Buclaw wrote:
My worst kept secret is out.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTk2NA
This is great news.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 10/4/2011 11:50 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
My worst kept secret is out.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTk2NA
Awesome! Two things, though:
1. When will this actually happen? Is GCC 4.7 going to have GDC in it?
2. How will the impedance mismatch between DMD Front End's
== Quote from dsimcha (dsim...@yahoo.com)'s article
> On 10/4/2011 11:50 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> > My worst kept secret is out.
> >
> > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTk2NA
> Awesome! Two things, though:
> 1. When will this actually happen? Is GCC 4.7 going to have GDC in i
Why not just write a redirect rule from the old D pages to the new ones?
On Oct 4, 2011, at 11:55 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 05, 2011 03:50:35 Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> My worst kept secret is out.
>>
>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTk2NA
>
> *Sigh* T
"dsimcha" wrote in message
news:j6hkec$7lb$1...@digitalmars.com...
>
> 2. How will the impedance mismatch between DMD Front End's fast release
> cycle and GCC's slower release cycle be handled? I'm definitely not going
> to use the "official" version of GDC packaged with my Linux distro or
>
Maybe if this was posted on Reddit it would get some vocal support and
give the GNU guys reassurance that D is a sought-after language.
Anyway this is great news! Congrats to Iain Buclaw and anyone else who helped.
Andrej Mitrovic, el 6 de octubre a las 00:34 me escribiste:
> Maybe if this was posted on Reddit it would get some vocal support and
> give the GNU guys reassurance that D is a sought-after language.
>
> Anyway this is great news! Congrats to Iain Buclaw and anyone else who helped.
Great news in
Iain,
You've made a cross for yourself there! If you need help with grunt tasks -
like a
broken piece of D code with a decent description of the problem, or even
grunter,
I might be able to help. As you know, I've been in those muddy waters before
with
nobody to even consult. With a guru like y
Just as a matter of interest, how do you rate GDC 2.055 for speed
alongside the Linux DMD.
Of course it is way faster. You should compare with gcc instead.
Are you saying that GDC is way faster?
But I take your point.
Steve
Am 07.10.2011, 13:28 Uhr, schrieb Steve Teale
:
Are you saying that GDC is way faster?
Yep. Especially for floating point calculations.
Worst-case scenario for dmd:
http://www.mail-archive.com/digitalmars-d@puremagic.com/msg61860.html
(be sure to read through the whole thread though, I refi
15 matches
Mail list logo
