nable feedback buried in
the 20+ pages that some DIP reviews generate (particularly
Walter's). So henceforward, we're going with two threads per
review round: one for discussion and one for feedback
(critique).
It's all laid out in this blog post:
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/01/26/di
nable feedback buried in
the 20+ pages that some DIP reviews generate (particularly
Walter's). So henceforward, we're going with two threads per
review round: one for discussion and one for feedback
(critique).
It's all laid out in this blog post:
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/01/26/di
nable feedback buried in
the 20+ pages that some DIP reviews generate (particularly
Walter's). So henceforward, we're going with two threads per
review round: one for discussion and one for feedback
(critique).
It's all laid out in this blog post:
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/01/26/di
On Sunday, 26 January 2020 at 09:01:03 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The goal is to separate explicit feedback from discussion.
+1
erate (particularly Walter's). So
henceforward, we're going with two threads per review round: one
for discussion and one for feedback (critique).
It's all laid out in this blog post:
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/01/26/dip-reviews-discussion-vs-feedback/
Also on reddit:
http
