http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4899
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis 2010-09-20 23:47:02
PDT ---
/++
(See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at
http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
+/
module d;
void main()
{
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.purema
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3847
--- Comment #15 from BCS 2010-09-20 22:15:25 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #11)
> more
> readable and less bug-prone operators.
Franky I find the fact that && and || are not keywords make them *More*
readable and as a result *Less* bug-prone.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3175
Shin Fujishiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsi...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4446
Shin Fujishiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4898
Aldo Nunez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Aldo Nune
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4290
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Bealer 2010-09-20 20:04:28
PDT ---
I think when you are defining opCmp, it's a bit like overriding a function
signature, therefore, if D tries to prevent function hijacking, it makes
perfect sense for it to do the sam
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4742
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4903
Summary: opopAssignRight is needed for operator overloading
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3847
Brad Roberts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WONTFIX
--- Comment #14 from Brad Rober
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3847
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4375
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan M Davis 2010-09-20 18:26:31
PDT ---
"The dangling else problem" is essentially the official name of the problem of
knowing which if to put the last else with if you have a series of if
statements with an else state
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3847
--- Comment #12 from Stewart Gordon 2010-09-20 18:04:33 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Some C++ programmers don't even know about 'and' and 'or' because
> the C++ compilers do nothing to suggest, encourage or force the
> usage of those m
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4902
Summary: No label and variable with the same name error
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4902
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-09-20 18:01:57 PDT ---
So far in my code I have never had a bug caused by this, so I consider this
low-priority.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4407
--- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-09-20 17:47:19 PDT ---
It's present among the Semantic Errors of Java code in the Google Web Toolkit
too:
http://code.google.com/intl/en-EN/webtoolkit/tools/codepro/doc/features/audit/audit_rules_
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4375
--- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-09-20 17:41:37 PDT ---
It seems that not just GCC flags this a possible error, in the Java audit rules
in some Google Software this problem is named "Dangling Else":
http://code.google.com/intl/en
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4407
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-09-20 17:32:46 PDT ---
To keep the language semantics more uniform (instead of special-casing just in
methods), all redundant assignments may be flagged as errors:
void main() {
int x;
x
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3847
--- Comment #11 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-09-20 17:24:18 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> It sums up the typical attitude I've seen towards them.
Some C++ programmers don't even know about 'and' and 'or' because the C++
compilers do
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4290
--- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-09-20 16:46:25 PDT ---
It seems we are in irreducible disagreement here.
> But opCmp is a valid function! I can still call it, even though it's not put
into the typeinfo.
Of course. But when it
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3554
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan M Davis 2010-09-20 16:45:48
PDT ---
Sorry, I didn't read the bug report all the way through. A new warning relating
to unmatched parens in ddoc popped up with 2.049, and it specifically mentions
$(LPAREN) and $(RP
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3554
--- Comment #12 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-09-20 16:35:12 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> They _are_ defined. They're $(LPAREN) and $(RPAREN).
Then where is the bug? Because there is a problem still.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3554
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
--- Comment #11
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3554
--- Comment #10 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-09-20 12:45:52 PDT ---
I may open a different bug report that asks for LPAREN and RPAREN macros to be
defined in dmd, to be sure this problem doesn't get lost.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.p
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3516
a...@aligature.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@aligature.com
--- Comment #8
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4470
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4583
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4524
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4541
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||necrom...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Don 201
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4613
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4696
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4632
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4641
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3273
--- Comment #6 from Don 2010-09-20 08:34:31 PDT ---
Have just discovered bug 4714, which still fails with this patch. I think this
patch is wrong.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are r
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4714
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
Severity|normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4712
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Severity|normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4871
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4892
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4899
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johannesp...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3554
--- Comment #9 from Johannes Pfau 2010-09-20 07:28:22
PDT ---
Yeah, I also brought this up on the dmd-internals mailing list recently. The
problem is that the patch replaces the parenthesis with LPAREN and RPAREN
macros. Dmd should define thes
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4290
--- Comment #6 from Steven Schveighoffer 2010-09-20
06:03:43 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > Why should the D compiler refuse to compile them?
>
> The D compiler has to disallow or warn against common traps.
But opCmp is a valid functio
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4901
Summary: std.algorithm.sort does not compile for interfaces
that cannot be printed.
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
S
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4290
--- Comment #5 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-09-20 05:25:27 PDT ---
> Why should the D compiler refuse to compile them?
The D compiler has to disallow or warn against common traps.
> This is probably a job for a lint-type tool.
If some bu
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4900
Summary: compiler still slow due to a single function
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Co
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4721
Steven Schveighoffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3554
--- Comment #8 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-09-20 05:03:38 PDT ---
This bug doesn't seem fixed in dmd 2.049. This program:
/// Return a random number in [0, 10 $(LPAREN)
void foo() {}
void main() {}
Generates an html that doesn't show t
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4382
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3420
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[PATCH] Allow string import |Allow string import of
|of file
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3715
--- Comment #4 from Steven Schveighoffer 2010-09-20
04:36:35 PDT ---
Well, first of all, toString should always be const.
But pure and nothrow are two options that are also valid. I think some real
thought needs to go into delegates and func
48 matches
Mail list logo
