http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5232
Summary: [patch] std.conv.to & std.conv.roundTo report invalid
overflows for very large numbers
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: N
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
nfx...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nfx...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
Summary: BigInt lacks a normal toString()
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Compo
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2095
--- Comment #18 from Stewart Gordon 2010-11-17 16:57:33 PST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Really, the only question is whether you can get away with it with
> some form of const, and I believe that the consensus on it in the
> newsgroup las
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
--- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-17 15:55:19 PST ---
This problem may be solved by a better profiler, or by an alternative to the
switch suggested in bug 5070
If this idea is bad then it may be closed.
--
Configure issuemail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2095
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
--- Comment #17
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2095
--- Comment #16 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-17 15:13:10 PST ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> I'm afraid, there's nothing to test at runtime,
Some runtime data info may be added, then. There is already some of it for
classes and modules.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2056
--- Comment #3 from Sobirari Muhomori 2010-11-17
14:21:51 PST ---
So this is a regression?
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5093
simon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #816 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5203
Matthias Pleh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|websites|installer
AssignedTo|nob...@pur
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3889
--- Comment #7 from Sobirari Muhomori 2010-11-17
12:26:41 PST ---
ps Huh, [] actually has 4 possible meanings, I forgot about either array
operation or full slice operator.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2095
--- Comment #15 from Bruno Medeiros 2010-11-17
12:24:40 PST ---
For the record, the same problem also occurs with pointer types:
B* ba=[new B()].ptr;
A* aa=ba;
*aa=new A;
(*ba).methodB(); // (*ba) is expected to be B, but is A
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3889
--- Comment #6 from Sobirari Muhomori 2010-11-17
12:23:21 PST ---
compare
---
foo[]=(cast(Foo[])[])[]; //copy empty array
foo[]=(cast(Foo[])null)[]; //copy null slice
---
The first line has all 3 meanings of []
--
Configure issuemail: http
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2056
Bruno Medeiros changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3031
--- Comment #2 from Lukasz Wrzosek 2010-11-17 12:12:50
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=817)
Fix for this bug.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: --
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3889
--- Comment #5 from Sobirari Muhomori 2010-11-17
12:01:15 PST ---
> Here I don't care if for 'null' is easier to parse by the compiler. Here I
> care
> more for the programmer and the semantics in his/her head.
Programmer has a parser too.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #23 from Sobirari Muhomori 2010-11-17
12:04:03 PST ---
If constfold can access a's type, it can make the right decision.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5230
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #1 from Don 2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5230
Summary: ICE(tocsym.c) overriding a method that has an out
contract
Product: D
Version: D1 & D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: ic
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #1 from Don 2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3889
--- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-17 04:33:47 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I think, null is easier to parse.
Here I don't care if for 'null' is easier to parse by the compiler. Here I care
more for the programmer and the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5229
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #1 from Don 2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #22 from Stewart Gordon 2010-11-17 03:58:08 PST ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> doesn't this solve that problem? a ~ ("this" ~ "that")
It does. My point was that somebody might accidentally not add the brackets.
--
Configure iss
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5229
Summary: Inaccurate parsing of floating-point literals
Product: D
Version: D1 & D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5216
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4864
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
27 matches
Mail list logo