https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16283
--- Comment #9 from Sobirari Muhomori ---
(In reply to Steven Schveighoffer from comment #8)
> We put up with a lot of grammar inaccuracies that result in simply ignored
> attributes. We can do better.
You mean you want to disallow this in grammar?
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16296
Issue ID: 16296
Summary: std.math.expo should run in CTFE
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16296
greensunn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|std.math.expo should run in |std.math.exp should be
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16283
--- Comment #10 from Steven Schveighoffer ---
(In reply to Sobirari Muhomori from comment #9)
> (In reply to Steven Schveighoffer from comment #8)
> > We put up with a lot of grammar inaccuracies that result in simply ignored
> > attributes. We can d
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
Steven Schveighoffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schvei...@yahoo.com
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16297
Issue ID: 16297
Summary: Immutable data with statically-known initializer
should be implicitly "static"
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
S
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
Ketmar Dark changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org
--- Comment #1 from Ke
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
--- Comment #2 from Ketmar Dark ---
aha. i see.
the thing is that std.internal.phobosinit is not imported from anywhere, so
linker simply not including it in resulting executable!
but with .so, it is included with all other phobos modules (as linke
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
--- Comment #3 from Steven Schveighoffer ---
(In reply to Ketmar Dark from comment #2)
> aha. i see.
>
> the thing is that std.internal.phobosinit is not imported from anywhere, so
> linker simply not including it in resulting executable!
>
Well..
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
--- Comment #4 from Ketmar Dark ---
as nothing directly referring to module ctors, linker just doesn't know that it
should not optimize 'em away. maybe we can fix that by emiting some flag for .o
files, but i don't really know -- i never even read ab
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
--- Comment #5 from Ketmar Dark ---
p.s. i think that vibe.d works 'cause it passes all it's files to dmd instead
of creating .a library. then dmd generating single object file with everything
necessary inside, including module ctors. but for .a libr
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
Steven Schveighoffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@puremagic.com|schvei...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #6 fr
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
--- Comment #7 from Steven Schveighoffer ---
(In reply to Ketmar Dark from comment #4)
> for now, easy fix is to move that thing back to "std.encoding", as it seems
> to not conflict with anything now. and probably create a new issue that
> documents
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
--- Comment #8 from Ketmar Dark ---
>I should tell you that cycle detection is currently broken
yes, i know. but std.encoding seems to not import anything that may indirectly
import it back, and it *seems* to not break anything for my system.
i'm no
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
--- Comment #9 from Steven Schveighoffer ---
(In reply to Ketmar Dark from comment #8)
> yes, i know. but std.encoding seems to not import anything that may
> indirectly import it back, and it *seems* to not break anything for my
> system.
That's be
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
--- Comment #10 from Ketmar Dark ---
Created attachment 1603
--> https://issues.dlang.org/attachment.cgi?id=1603&action=edit
lazy standard codec registration
the attached patch seems to work ok with my system. it registers standard
codecs when use
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
--- Comment #11 from Ketmar Dark ---
p.s. we probably can enumerate all std.encoding module symbols with CTFE
reflection instead, but i don't think that it makes huge difference here.
paying small fee at program startup looks better for me than payin
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
--- Comment #12 from Steven Schveighoffer ---
Ketmar, thanks for the patch. I think you should open a new bug report with it
so it doesn't get lost. I have to fix the phobosinit code anyway, which will
close this.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16298
Issue ID: 16298
Summary: [ER] lazily register standard codecs from std.encoding
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
--- Comment #13 from Ketmar Dark ---
did it: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16298
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16298
Ketmar Dark changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
Jack Stouffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@jackstouffer.com
Severity|enh
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
Jack Stouffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86_64 |All
OS|Linux
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15925
Mathias Lang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #16 from Mathias Lang ---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15925
--- Comment #17 from Steven Schveighoffer ---
(In reply to Mathias Lang from comment #16)
> The details of the bug were wrong (it should be ignored unlike what I
> originally believed)
While this has your attention, can you point me at the rationale
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16299
Issue ID: 16299
Summary: Documentation for Phobos needs to warn about
autodecoding
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13537
--- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/09ed87c973fbcb777806506f7e05fbed30a3f355
fix Issue 13537 - Unions may break immutability
https://githu
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13537
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15925
--- Comment #18 from Mathias Lang ---
(In reply to Steven Schveighoffer from comment #17)
> (In reply to Mathias Lang from comment #16)
> > The details of the bug were wrong (it should be ignored unlike what I
> > originally believed)
>
> While this
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16282
--- Comment #2 from Wyatt ---
I guess it might? It looks about how I had envisioned it, but I'm not really
jazzed about the idea of installing an entire mathematics package for a one-off
script I was expecting to take fifteen minutes.
As for the re
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
--- Comment #15 from Steven Schveighoffer ---
I'm going to have to take back what I said. I added back in the static ctors,
and there is no cycle, even with my patch that fixes cycle detection. It's
probably all the work on trimming out unnecessary i
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15925
--- Comment #19 from det <2k...@gmx.net> ---
(In reply to Mathias Lang from comment #18)
> The rationale is that this behavior allowed symbol hijacking.
>
> The behavior of the compiler was changed to perform 2 passes for symbol
> resolution, the fir
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
--- Comment #16 from Ketmar Dark ---
how did you dare to make my great patch unnecessary?! ;-))
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
--- Comment #17 from Ketmar Dark ---
p.s. if it works, please, close my ER in issue 16298 then.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16282
--- Comment #3 from greenify ---
> It looks about how I had envisioned it, but I'm not really
jazzed about the idea of installing an entire mathematics package for a one-off
script I was expecting to take fifteen minutes.
Do you know about the new i
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
--- Comment #18 from Steven Schveighoffer ---
(In reply to Ketmar Dark from comment #17)
> p.s. if it works, please, close my ER in issue 16298 then.
Sure. I personally hate the way std.encoding registers all the encodings, so
I'd like to fix that a
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16291
--- Comment #19 from Ketmar Dark ---
>But maybe your idea of registering on demand is worth considering even with
>that
>update.
if you'll decide that it worth keeping, then just drop a note in 16298, i can
rewrite the patch to use CT reflection ins
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15925
--- Comment #20 from Steven Schveighoffer ---
(In reply to Mathias Lang from comment #18)
> Feel free to reach out to me by email if not.
In the interest of keeping the discussion public, I'll just reply here.
> Now there is something special about
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15925
--- Comment #21 from Steven Schveighoffer ---
To add to this, I think the use case being held as the example that shows why
this was done is:
a.d:
module a;
struct S {}
void foo() {}
void m(S s) {}
// uncomment to hijack!
// void bar() {}
b.d:
m
39 matches
Mail list logo
