https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21367
Issue ID: 21367
Summary: Nameless union propagates copy constructors and
destructors over all members
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Sta
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4421
Илья Ярошенко changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ilyayaroshe...@gmail.com
--- Comment #10 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21368
Issue ID: 21368
Summary: copy-constructors aren't called for static arrays
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20879
Илья Ярошенко changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ilyayaroshe...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11435
--- Comment #13 from Walter Bright ---
(In reply to safety0ff.bugz from comment #8)
> I managed to work around this issue by modifying the following code from
> src/backend/cod1.c: (line ~3573)
This code indeed is wrong. Will fix.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11435
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-O optimization flag causes |Pushing indirect ref to
|i
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11435
--- Comment #14 from Dlang Bot ---
@WalterBright created dlang/dmd pull request #11933 "fix Issue 11435 - Pushing
indirect ref to byte or short can read beyo…" fixing this issue:
- fix Issue 11435 - Pushing indirect ref to byte or short can read bey
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21369
Issue ID: 21369
Summary: Compiler doesn't allow lvalues via alias this when
wrapper is an rvalue
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: Mac OS X
Sta
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18026
--- Comment #19 from JR ---
Small update.
I no longer experience this with the dmd and ldc from the Arch/Manjaro
repository, even when checking out the old `overflow` branch used in the
original report.
I do experience it when I build dmd myself (w
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20600
moonlightsenti...@disroot.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11435
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13501
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14131
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #8 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13501
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Panteleev ---
I can understand such limitations being present for scope(exit), but not for
scope(success). scope(success) blocks are trivially lowered by inserting code
before all returns (or other statements that normall
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13501
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Panteleev ---
(In reply to Vladimir Panteleev from comment #6)
> Such a deprecation would need to be about any and all nothrow code,
non-nothrow code*
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17160
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18734
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||backend
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20605
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21230
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||backend
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21364
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||backend
CC|
20 matches
Mail list logo