On 05/24/2011 10:28 PM, Matthew Ong wrote:
However, when doing overload resolution, the functions in the base class
are not considered:
// ### Why Not? Since B is a subset of A, and within B itself methods
inherited from A can be called.
b.foo(1); // calls B.foo(long), since
Hi,
I am not able make use of these 3 special tokens to print something.
writefln(gshared: %s,__gshared);
writefln(thread: %s,__thread);
writefln(traits: %s,__traits);
rc\Sample.d(128): expression expected, not '__gshared'
Hi,
If I am writing a database library such as DSL, Data Service Layer,
there is a need for me to do a good clean up for the connections/results
sets/transactions that this library is currently handling.
How ever, if another library/package somewhere else calls for a
On 2011-05-25 01:29, Matthew Ong wrote:
Hi,
I am not able make use of these 3 special tokens to print something.
writefln(gshared: %s,__gshared);
writefln(thread: %s,__thread);
writefln(traits: %s,__traits);
Matthew Ong:
This may sound inefficient, but since the D compiler knows all of the
class hierarchy when generating code, all functions that are not
overridden can be optimized to be non-virtual.
This is pure theory, little more than advertisement. Also because D supports
separate
Matthew Ong:
I am not able make use of these 3 special tokens to print something.
writefln(gshared: %s,__gshared);
writefln(thread: %s,__thread);
writefln(traits: %s,__traits);
They are keywords, so it's like writing:
writefln(traits: %s, for);
Would some like to show me how this is
On 5/25/2011 5:45 PM, bearophile wrote:
Matthew Ong:
I am not able make use of these 3 special tokens to print something.
writefln(gshared: %s,__gshared);
writefln(thread: %s,__thread);
writefln(traits: %s,__traits);
They are keywords, so it's like writing:
writefln(traits: %s, for);
Am 25.05.2011 12:42, schrieb Matthew Ong:
On 5/25/2011 5:45 PM, bearophile wrote:
Matthew Ong:
I am not able make use of these 3 special tokens to print something.
writefln(gshared: %s,__gshared);
writefln(thread: %s,__thread);
writefln(traits: %s,__traits);
They are keywords, so
Am 25.05.2011 10:29, schrieb Matthew Ong:
Hi,
I am not able make use of these 3 special tokens to print something.
writefln(gshared: %s,__gshared);
writefln(thread: %s,__thread);
writefln(traits: %s,__traits);
rc\Sample.d(128):
I think __thread might be an alias for thread local. Maybe it was used
explicitly in D1 since D1 didn't have TLS by default?
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/class.html#StaticDestructor
-Steve
On 5/25/2011 11:13 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/class.html#StaticDestructor
-Steve
Static Destructor maybe executed when the class is being unloaded GC?
Because this is a class level. It is more like the application level
exit and such.
That is not
On 05/24/2011 11:42 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Yes, but all declarations in classes or modules are public by default.
Thanks for the correction.
All this time I've been thinking the opposite. My understanding seemed
correct, since most of the little programs that I've written have been
in a
On 05/25/2011 08:35 AM, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/25/2011 11:13 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/class.html#StaticDestructor
-Steve
Static Destructor maybe executed when the class is being unloaded GC?
Because this is a class level. It is more like the
On Wed, 25 May 2011 11:35:51 -0400, Matthew Ong on...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 5/25/2011 11:13 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/class.html#StaticDestructor
-Steve
Static Destructor maybe executed when the class is being unloaded GC?
Because this is a class level.
On Wed, 25 May 2011 11:50:16 -0400, Ali Çehreli acehr...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 05/25/2011 08:35 AM, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/25/2011 11:13 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/class.html#StaticDestructor
-Steve
Static Destructor maybe executed when the class is
On 5/25/2011 11:52 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
If you want a static dtor that runs on every thread shutdown, use a
normal static dtor. If you want one that runs on the entire application
shutdown, use a shared static dtor.
-Steve
Module Destructor: Cool feature that I can consider to use
On Wed, 25 May 2011 11:52:14 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2011 11:35:51 -0400, Matthew Ong on...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 5/25/2011 11:13 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/class.html#StaticDestructor
-Steve
Static
On 5/25/11, Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
If you want a static dtor that runs on every thread shutdown, use a normal
static dtor. If you want one that runs on the entire application
shutdown, use a shared static dtor.
I saw some commits change a static dtor to a shared
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
The DMD zips contain all the source code. You should be able to do this:
- Unzip dmd.2.053.zip (or whatever other version you want)
- Go into the 'src/dmd' directory
- Compile dmd (For me, it's just make -f linux.mak, but I'm on a
On 5/26/2011 12:23 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 5/25/11, Steven Schveighofferschvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
If you want a static dtor that runs on every thread shutdown, use a normal
static dtor. If you want one that runs on the entire application
shutdown, use a shared static dtor.
I saw some
21 matches
Mail list logo
