In this case I have not appreciated implicit char <-> int conversions in D
(this comes from a bug of mine):
void main(string[] args) {
foreach (c; args[1])
switch (c) {
case 0: .. case 9: // do something with the digit
default:
}
}
Bye,
bearophile
Currently this doesn't work, but I'd like to do this:
import std.typecons;
void main() {
const int x = 1;
const int y = 2;
auto t = tuple(x, y);
}
Is it possible to modify the tuples to allow this?
Bye,
bearophile
Hi,
I'm trying to clear big associative arrays, but I always get an
object error - what I currently doing is:
private string[uint] myAA;
void main() {
fill(myAA);
myAA.clear();
fill(myAA); // object.Error: Access Violation
}
void fill(string[uint] aa) {
for (uint i = 0; i < 10_000_
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On 2011-05-30 19:53, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Ary Manzana" wrote in message
>> news:is1hsa$p53$1...@digitalmars.com...
>>
>> > On 5/31/11 7:58 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> >> "bearophile" wrote in message
>> >> news:is1dj6$ihb$1...@d
On Mon, 30 May 2011 09:42:53 -0400, Johann MacDonagh
wrote:
I'm wondering if there's a cleaner way to do this:
class Test(T = uint)
{
this(string s)
{
}
}
void main(string[] argv)
{
auto a = new Test!()("test");
}
I'd *like* to be able to do this:
auto a = new Test("te
On Mon, 30 May 2011 20:43:18 -0400, bearophile
wrote:
Jesse Phillips:
The purpose is commenting out code, but note that there is also
version(none) { } which is never compiled in.
version(none) {} is probably the official way to comment out code.
And if you use a versioning system to kee
On 2011-05-31 10:49, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2011 09:42:53 -0400, Johann MacDonagh
>
> wrote:
> > I'm wondering if there's a cleaner way to do this:
> >
> > class Test(T = uint)
> > {
> >
> > this(string s)
> > {
> > }
> >
> > }
> >
> > void main(string[] argv)
> > {
> >
On Tue, 31 May 2011 19:49:24 +0200, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Currently, you can omit the template args only in the case of IFTI
(Implicit Function Template Instantiation) which actually deduces your
template arguments based on the function call.
I'd argue actually, that IFTI should be
Hi,
I have a class which defines a nested class:
class Outer1 {
class Inner1 { }
}
Now I want to inherit from Outer1, to modify its behavior in a way
which also involves modifying the behavior of the corresponding inner
objects. My first instinct was to write
class Outer2 : Outer1 {
class
>
> Changed directories back to:
> dmd2\windows\bin
> dmd2\windows\lib
> dmd2\src
>
fixed.
Thank you for your help.
Robert Smith
On Tue, 31 May 2011 20:17:23 +0200, Michael Shulman
wrote:
I have thought of a workaround with 'alias this':
class Outer2 : Outer1 {
class Inner2 {
Inner1 _self;
alias _self this;
this() {
_self = this.outer.new Inner1();
}
}
}
This seems to work, but requires manu
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
>> I have thought of a workaround with 'alias this':
>>
>> class Outer2 : Outer1 {
>> class Inner2 {
>> Inner1 _self;
>> alias _self this;
>> this() {
>> _self = this.outer.new Inner1();
>> }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> This seems to wo
useo:
> So... is there any solution to clear associative arrays
> without memory leaking?
What about remove an item at a time inside a loop (iterations on the keys
array), and then doing a rehash?
Bye,
bearophile
I realize that this might sound strange, but try setting myAA to null
after clear(), this should fix the crash.
David
On 5/31/11 4:00 PM, useo wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to clear big associative arrays, but I always get an
object error - what I currently doing is:
private string[uint] myAA;
voi
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.vwcxmwfgeav7ka@localhost.localdomain...
> On Mon, 30 May 2011 20:43:18 -0400, bearophile
> wrote:
>
>> Jesse Phillips:
>>
>>> The purpose is commenting out code, but note that there is also
>>> version(none) { } which is never compiled in.
>>
>>
On 2011-05-31 18:03, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
> news:op.vwcxmwfgeav7ka@localhost.localdomain...
>
> > On Mon, 30 May 2011 20:43:18 -0400, bearophile
> >
> > wrote:
> >> Jesse Phillips:
> >>> The purpose is commenting out code, but note that there is also
Thanks for your detailed answer :)
17 matches
Mail list logo
