Over on the digitalmars.D newsgroup,
On 11/8/2011 2:35 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote (in a thread
entitled "assert(obj) is an atrocity"):
> Hi,
>
> As the title suggests, I'm going to be rather blunt about this.
> assert(obj) testing the invariant *without* doing a null check is insane
> for the f
I find typedef useful still. While trying to create a poor's man typedef using
a struct with alis this, I have found this problem:
struct Typedef(T) {
T data;
alias data this;
}
alias int[] TA1;
typedef int[] TA2;
alias Typedef!(int[]) TA3;
immutable TA1 a1;
immutable TA2 a2;
TA3 a3a;
Dear,
After read this thread:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/learn/Web_Development_27414.html
and this one:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/learn/How_To_Dynamic_Web_Rendering_26770.html
I am a little disapointed, so if you have many request for a web page
t
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6910
On 08/11/2011 20:09, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
which is very confusing to me. Guess this is a bug?
Tobias
Looks like a bug to me. This works:
struct Bag(S...)
{
alias S Types;
}
template Test(/*alias i,*/ B)
{
void fn() {
foreach(t; B.Types)
{
pragma(msg,
maarten van damme:
> But I have also lost interest because of a couple of shortcommings, the
> hell it is to debug that thing and when it finally compiles fine on 2
> machines it gives a cryptic error about glue.c (that had something to do
> with rdmd)
What is the message of this cryptic error, a
Am 08.11.2011, 21:04 Uhr, schrieb maarten van damme
:
I have stolen an isvisible method from the c# bot
bool isVisible(Loc loc){
Loc[] offsets;
int squares = cast(int)floor(sqrt(_viewradius2));
for (int r = -1 * squares; r <= squares; ++r){
for (int c = -1 * squares; c <= squares; ++c){
int
Please take a look at this code
struct Bag(S...)
{
alias S Types;
}
template Test(alias i, B)
{
void fn() {
foreach(t; B.Types)
{
switch(i) {
case IndexOf!(t, B.Types):
{
pragma(msg, __tra
I have stolen an isvisible method from the c# bot
bool isVisible(Loc loc){
Loc[] offsets;
int squares = cast(int)floor(sqrt(_viewradius2));
for (int r = -1 * squares; r <= squares; ++r){
for (int c = -1 * squares; c <= squares; ++c){
int square = r * r + c * c;
if (square < _viewradius2){
Loc new
Am 23.10.2011, 21:51 Uhr, schrieb bearophile :
Jonathan M Davis:
my general take on it is that dmd should _never_ ignore attributes,
I agree. Such sloppiness is a very good source for problems, long term
ones too, and it makes it harder to learn D.
Bye,
bearophile
+1
For example I stil
Am 23.10.2011, 19:52 Uhr, schrieb Jesse Phillips
:
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 16:24:09 +0200, maarten van damme wrote:
I'm noticing some problems, there are some methods missing used in the
tutorial like "unocupied", the do_setup part and the visible method. Is
this package complete or am I missing
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
> The second is when I want to find its definition. Hmmm, should I be
> greping for /class Window/, /interface Window/, or /struct Window/
[a-z]* Window ?
> Or do you really need assignField to work with runtime values ?
Yes, that's the problem.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:21, RivenTheMage wrote:
> Is it possible to do such thing without using string mixin?
Hi,
you can use another tuple:
struct Key(T...)
{
T fields;
uint numFields = T.length;
void assignFields(U...)(U args) if (U.length == T.length)
{
foreach(i,
Is it possible to do such thing without using string mixin?
import std.stdio;
import std.metastrings;
struct Key(T...)
{
static string declareFields() // compile-time
{
string declaration;
foreach (index, type; T)
I just looked at my local Juno source, and it does have the change that i
mentioned in that forum post. I just added an extra version of opAssign:
void opAssign(R)(R dg) if (is (R : MethodProxy) )
{
method = dg.method;
returnType = dg.returnType;
paramTypes = dg.paramTypes;
}
I
16 matches
Mail list logo
