On Sunday, March 26, 2017 20:51:01 XavierAP via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> I've perused both the spec[1] and Andrei's book, and I the idea I
> get is that module declarations are optional, recommended only in
> case of file names not being valid D names. But in the community
> (and Phobos) I see
On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 23:25:49 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
I've looked into Phobos to emulate it when defining my own
trait template, and when I see this:
module std.range.primitives;
// ...
template isInputRange(R)
{
enum bool isInputRange = is(typeof(
(inout int = 0)
{
R r
I've looked into Phobos to emulate it when defining my own trait
template, and when I see this:
module std.range.primitives;
// ...
template isInputRange(R)
{
enum bool isInputRange = is(typeof(
(inout int = 0)
{
R r = R.init; // can define a range object
if (r.em
On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 20:51:01 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
I've perused both the spec[1] and Andrei's book, and I the idea
I get is that module declarations are optional, recommended
only in case of file names not being valid D names. But in the
community (and Phobos) I see it's strongly recomme
On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 22:10:07 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
I was curious but I guess it's long to explain the different
things that can go wrong if one doesn't declare module names.
You'll just get a name conflict eventually. Either two modules
with the same name, or "module `foo` must be impor
On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 20:58:24 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Module declarations are only optional in the most trivial case
that is rarely useful in real world code. I recommend you
ALWAYS use them (and always put a ddoc comment on them!), and
moreover that you avoid top name modules (use
On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 18:50:13 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 11:46:39 UTC, Jolly James wrote:
[...]
Chances are it's invoked in another thread and thus you can't
catch it like that.
To sum it up.
Ex.
void thisFunctionThrows() { ... }
void ableToCatch() {
try {
On 03/26/2017 11:31 PM, Dlearner wrote:
SDL_Surface* surface = IMG_Load(filename.ptr);
if (surface is null) {
writeln("surface is null: ", to!string(IMG_GetError()));
} else {
writeln(filename);
}
From console:
surface is null: Couldn't open Models/Nanosuit/helmet_dif
On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 12:40:42 UTC, Dlearner wrote:
...
About half the textures seem to load fine. Some progress!
I don't know why, but when I get to the 8th texture, the filename
has some garbage attached.
SDL_Surface* surface = IMG_Load(filename.ptr);
if (surface is null) {
On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 20:51:01 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
I've perused both the spec[1] and Andrei's book, and I the idea
I get is that module declarations are optional, recommended
only in case of file names not being valid D names.
Module declarations are only optional in the most trivial ca
I've perused both the spec[1] and Andrei's book, and I the idea I
get is that module declarations are optional, recommended only in
case of file names not being valid D names. But in the community
(and Phobos) I see it's strongly recommended and used throughout.
What's the reason? If the decla
On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 11:46:39 UTC, Jolly James wrote:
On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 11:35:00 UTC, Jolly James wrote:
[...]
Found out something: You cannot catch any exception thrown in
the listen()-method in general.
■ Original code:
[...]
■ Modified one:
[...]
■ Not working t
On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 11:10:55 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 10:34:21 UTC, Dlearner wrote:
I came back to this project and realised my mistakes (Importer
is a class for the C++ API, and we're using the C API).
So I fixed all my errors, but now I get an access violation.
On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 11:35:00 UTC, Jolly James wrote:
On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 02:41:46 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 02:24:56 UTC, Jolly James wrote:
You can ignore the loop()-method. It is not called as the
application will never reach this statement, because
On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 02:41:46 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 02:24:56 UTC, Jolly James wrote:
You can ignore the loop()-method. It is not called as the
application will never reach this statement, because it
cannot, because it crashes already in the listen()-method
On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 10:34:21 UTC, Dlearner wrote:
I came back to this project and realised my mistakes (Importer
is a class for the C++ API, and we're using the C API).
So I fixed all my errors, but now I get an access violation.
As far as I can tell, it seems to be an issue with
`aiGet
I came back to this project and realised my mistakes (Importer is
a class for the C++ API, and we're using the C API).
So I fixed all my errors, but now I get an access violation.
As far as I can tell, it seems to be an issue with
`aiGetMaterialTexture`. It is meant to return an aiString with a
On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 07:18:14 UTC, ketmar wrote:
i.e. what compiler does (roughly) is inserting anonymous fields
of the appropriate size *into* the container. for "inner"
aligning compiler inserts anonymous fields *between* other
fields. for "outer" aligning compiler just appends anonymo
zabruk70 wrote:
On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 06:45:13 UTC, ketmar wrote:
yes. you have a typo in second `writefln`: S1 instead of S2. ;-)
thank you.
another question, related to my first post:
why size of S2.b1 and S2.b2 still 3, not 4?
am i right: then align applied to members, compiler not
On 26/03/2017 7:52 AM, helxi wrote:
What's the difference between
1.
string x = "abcd";
foreach(character; x)
write(character);
and
string x = "abcd";
foreach(character; x[0..$])
write(character);
Hopefully the compiler is smart enough to ignore that slice (since its
20 matches
Mail list logo
