19-Jan-2013 11:14, Era Scarecrow пишет:
On Friday, 18 January 2013 at 16:42:04 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Slices should have a pointer and length so they can check range (in
debug builds), alternatively just a pointer to storage that nows the
range.
So write an alternate opIndex...
I thi
On Friday, 18 January 2013 at 16:42:04 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
Slices should have a pointer and length so they can check range
(in debug builds), alternatively just a pointer to storage that
nows the range.
So write an alternate opIndex...
I think slice ops could be made @safe if the pr
18-Jan-2013 01:49, Era Scarecrow пишет:
On Thursday, 17 January 2013 at 19:36:34 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
I'm thinking that a opSlice of stack-allocated must be @system and a
heap allocated can be @safe.
That's just a small part of the problem. With the new design, 90% of
it can be safe;
On Thursday, 17 January 2013 at 19:36:34 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
I'm thinking that a opSlice of stack-allocated must be @system
and a heap allocated can be @safe.
That's just a small part of the problem. With the new design,
90% of it can be safe; Just the actual slice buffer when you
r
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:36:33PM +0400, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
[...]
> I'm thinking that a opSlice of stack-allocated must be @system and a
> heap allocated can be @safe.
[...]
Related: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8838
T
--
Who told you to swim in Crocodile Lake without li
17-Jan-2013 22:34, Era Scarecrow пишет:
Thoughts? Feedback? I'm about ready to drop this and resume my
previous version and enhance it with recent experiences.
Feel free to do it how you see it. It's just that I think the
semantics of the previous version can't be improved to a consistent
st
On Thursday, 17 January 2013 at 18:12:28 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
Well, the slice was invalidated by shrinking an array. I don't
expect the below to work.
It just seems like shrinking/expanding the array should still
work, perhaps I'm thinking of them too much like a normal array
slice.
17-Jan-2013 07:53, Era Scarecrow пишет:
Well got a few curious problems. Slicing doesn't seem it wants to work
as a separate type and can cause problems.
Let's take an example. Say our slice is..
struct BitArraySlice {
BitArray* ba;
ulong start, end;
}
Now how much does i
Well got a few curious problems. Slicing doesn't seem it wants
to work as a separate type and can cause problems.
Let's take an example. Say our slice is..
struct BitArraySlice {
BitArray* ba;
ulong start, end;
}
Now how much does it depend on the bitarray that it's pointing
to