Re: [digitalradio] FCC Petition to Re-Establish Narrowbnad RTTY/Data Subband Comment Period Open

2007-12-29 Thread Mark Miller
At 11:28 AM 12/28/2007, you wrote: >Hi Mark, > >How would this kill various digital modes with a bandwidth of 1500 hertz >or less? I operate Oliva mostly at 500 hertz wide and sometimes and >1000 hertz wide. > >73, tom n4zpt If a mode's bandwidth is 1500 Hz or less, then there would be no change

Re: [digitalradio] FCC Petition to Re-Establish Narrowbnad RTTY/Data Subband Comment Period Open

2007-12-28 Thread Tom Azlin, N4ZPT
Hi Mark, How would this kill various digital modes with a bandwidth of 1500 hertz or less? I operate Oliva mostly at 500 hertz wide and sometimes and 1000 hertz wide. 73, tom n4zpt Mark Miller wrote: > The FCC has released > http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&i

Re: [digitalradio] FCC Petition to Re-Establish Narrowbnad RTTY/Data Subband Comment Period Open

2007-12-25 Thread Rick
This is a very well thought out solution to a on-going vexing problem on the HF RTTY/data bands. I have submitted my comments to the FCC in concurrence with Mark's petition and I strongly suggest that those who agree or those who disagree with the petition, submit your comments. If the petition

[digitalradio] FCC Petition to Re-Establish Narrowbnad RTTY/Data Subband Comment Period Open

2007-12-25 Thread Mark Miller
The FCC has released http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=6519820340 Public Notice report 2828-Correction establishing a new comment period for http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=6519008574 RM-11392. RM11392