Subject: Re: [digitalradio] JT65 - work in team
Patrick,
Also look at the WSJT group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wsjtgroup/ - Joe
also has an inactive developer group.
It would appear that much less than 1% of digital mode users actively develop
software, I know many excellent software guys
Patrick,
Also look at the WSJT group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wsjtgroup/ - Joe also
has an inactive developer group.
It would appear that much less than 1% of digital mode users actively develop
software, I know many excellent software guys who are also Hams but they just
don't have the s
trick
- Original Message -
From: Simon Brown
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] JT65 - work in team
Hi,
That's it. Your first step is to follow Joe's instructions and compile this,
then underst
Hi,
That's it. Your first step is to follow Joe's instructions and compile this,
then understand how to use it.
I have written a lot of user interface but not yet attacked the decoding.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Lindecker
* a file which name is WSJT
n cherche plus loin ("Deep search") et on atteint -27 dB (en JT65B,
-1 en JT65A et +1 en JT65C)
- Original Message -
From: Simon Brown
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] JT65 - work in team
No only a
No only am I interested, I am ahead of you - I hope to have this working with a
C++ engine under Windows by about the end of March 2008. Originally I was
targeting end of 2007 but decided to add SSTV support before finishing WSJT.
The WSJT code is Fortran, Python and C (I think) which is very ea
Hello to all,
I would be interested to study JT65 and, perhaps, add this mode to Multipsk
(let's say before the end of 2008 or the beginning of 2009).
The JT65 specifications are too much general and don't permit to build a code
from them.
I saw that the sources (Fortran and C or C++?) of JT65 e
