Re: [digitalradio] Re: knock it off "RANT"

2006-01-29 Thread Tim Gorman
On Sunday 29 January 2006 15:43, Dr. Howard S. White wrote: > You quote the RSGB statement of the fact that: > > "-The IARU Region 1 HF Bandplan has served the amateur community very well > for many years," > > Need I say any more... Yes, you do! As usual you leave out the operative part: "Howeve

Re: [digitalradio] Re: knock it off "RANT"

2006-01-29 Thread Dr. Howard S. White
29, 2006 6:10 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: knock it off "RANT" from the RSGB, Improving Bandplan Compliance, paper number 138-An increasing proportion of the Amateur Radio community is using non-CW m

Re: [digitalradio] Re: knock it off "RANT"

2006-01-29 Thread Tim Gorman
from the RSGB, Improving Bandplan Compliance, paper number 138 -An increasing proportion of the Amateur Radio community is using non-CW modes and deploying beacons within the CW communication sub-bands. -national societies cou

Re: [digitalradio] Re: knock it off "RANT"

2006-01-29 Thread Dr. Howard S. White
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 12:41 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: knock it off "RANT" --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]...> wrote:>> Can the Moderator, please stop this rubbish.> Can US hams please realise that th

[digitalradio] Re: knock it off "RANT"

2006-01-28 Thread Brad
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can the Moderator, please stop this rubbish. > Can US hams please realise that this is a worldwide group and it is read by hams around the world. > If you want to discuss your internal US problems do it somewhere else. > >