Thank you and very well said.
Danny Douglas
N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA
SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB
All 2 years or more (except Novice)
Pls QSL direct, buro, or LOTW preferred,
I Do not use, but as a courtesy do upload to eQSL for
those who do.
kh6ty wrote:
> 97.113 Prohibited transmissions. (a) No amateur station shall
> transmit:
>
> (5) Communications, on a regular basis, which could reasonably be
> furnished alternatively through other radio services.
Excellent point. The above regulation, interpreted reasonably, would
outlaw 9
>Flame on this idea if you wish, however robust "live-chat" sound-card
>modes,
>ARQ messaging modes, and Automatic Link Establishment (ALE)
>modes will all gain increased popularity, acceptance, and adoption because
>of their more efficient and reliable communication capabilities as compared
>to
>
MY POINT IS ..
You ( DIGITAL USERS ) call CW ( ANALOG ) stone age
..
You call those who enjoy SSB, AM, FM or just talking
on the radio the reason ham radio is dieing .
YOU ARE OUR SALVATION ! You by your digital modes will
save the bands from the invading army of other users
... then
But you're ignoring the aggregate effects. It's like showing your
wife a hair off an elephant that is rampaging through your house and
saying, "no big deal, look it's just a little hair".
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "John Becker, WØJAB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> At 07:26
First, let me say that these recommendations are based solely upon
hopes and dreams. There are no facts or data with by which one can
adequately assess the recommendations. If you want to convince
someone that further segmentation of the rtty/data segments into
smaller and smaller pieces is a goo