Walt/K5YFW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 2:28 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New to Digital HF -- PACTOR setup and
hardware maybe needed???
KV9U writes:
> Chris,
>
> W
KV9U writes:
> Chris,
>
> What is your view on using "pipelined" programming such as what was used
> in the SCAMP mode to get around this issue with moving the ACK to the
> next packet. The main penalty is latency for the user, but it seems
> manageable.
I haven't read any detailed specs
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:17:06 -0700, Chris Jewell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Suppose you're using your sound card as a modem to receive Pactor I
>data. Your sound card takes care of turning tones from the receiver
>into 1s and 0s. There's no problem there.
actually, there is a modem in the 736.
Chris,
What is your view on using "pipelined" programming such as what was used
in the SCAMP mode to get around this issue with moving the ACK to the
next packet. The main penalty is latency for the user, but it seems
manageable.
73,
Rick, KV9U
Chris Jewell wrote:
>Suppose you're using you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:02:33 -0500, John Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >It was on a linux system
> >But that does not matter.
> >The problem is EVERY time the computer "thinks"
> >what do I need to do now - the timing is lost and so
> >is the link.
>
>
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:02:33 -0500, John Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It was on a linux system
>But that does not matter.
>The problem is EVERY time the computer "thinks"
>what do I need to do now - the timing is lost and so
>is the link.
???
now, I am not a geek for computers, but my Perl
It was on a linux system
But that does not matter.
The problem is EVERY time the computer "thinks"
what do I need to do now - the timing is lost and so
is the link.
At 09:53 AM 8/27/2006, you wrote:
>Have you tried it with an up-scale sound card on a
>computer equipped with both a fast processor
> John Becker wrote:
> Pactor and Amtor use ARQ mode.
> Because of this timing a computer WILL NOT
> keep up with the TNC equipped station.
> I did run some test about 3 years ago and the
> computer only station on a AMTOR / PACTOR link
> could only do about 43% of what the TNC equipped
> station
Pactor and Amtor use ARQ mode.
Because of this timing a computer WILL NOT
keep up with the TNC equipped station.
I did run some test about 3 years ago and the
computer only station on a AMTOR / PACTOR link
could only do about 43% of what the TNC equipped
station did.
At 05:35 PM 8/26/2006, you wr
