Looks like Xerox no longer makes the Phaser. Their new printer is ColorCube.
On 03/04/2015 06:58 PM, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> Recommended models please :-)
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 04:49:33PM -0500, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
>>> No plans for hot ca
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 06:53:33AM -0500, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> Looks like Xerox no longer makes the Phaser. Their new printer is ColorCube.
>
Yup, name change. Apparently the Phaser name is now laser tech,
the wax printers are called ColorQube.
-dsr-
___
John Abreau writes:
> The Xerox Phaser fits comfortably on a desk.
We have a Xerox Phaser 6600DN and we like it.
My only issue is that the toner is pretty expensive.
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Boa
On March 4, 2015, Dan Ritter wrote:
>HP Pro 400 or Enterprise P3015dn are pretty comparable.
I have an HP LaserJet Pro M451dn. The pros are:
- Sets up easily on Linux, Mac, and Windows.
- Gorgeous color output.
- Reasonably priced under $300.
The cons are:
- A complete set of toner (4 cartrid
If you want to launch an Amazon Cloud instance with an application + LAMP
stack, don't try to "make things easier" by starting off with a Bitnami
AMI. You'll only shoot yourself in the foot, and end up starting over.
I'm against vendor lock-in, and their AMI doesn't come with an "uninstall"
optio
Greg Rundlett (freephile) wrote:
> If you want to launch an Amazon Cloud instance with an application + LAMP
> stack, don't try to "make things easier" by starting off with a Bitnami
> AMI. You'll only shoot yourself in the foot, and end up starting over.
>
> I'm against vendor lock-in...
All th
On 3/5/2015 7:25 PM, Tom Metro wrote:
All the cool kids are using Docker containers now. That's one way to
create some vendor independence between your application and your cloud
provider.
Perhaps not:
https://coreos.com/blog/rocket/
Docker isn't a container any more. It's a platform. Because