Re: [tdf-discuss] overall communication guidelines and reply-to mangling

2011-12-14 Thread Cor Nouws
Florian Effenberger wrote (15-12-11 00:41) - So, whatever I do, someone will be upset. Poor them ;-) No serious, I don't think people involved in this discussion will be really upset. Maybe slightly disappointed. But hey :-) - I myself would like to keep reply-to mangling as is, as I have

Re: [tdf-discuss] overall communication guidelines and reply-to mangling

2011-12-14 Thread Uwe Altmann
Hi Flo Am 15.12.11 00:41, schrieb Florian Effenberger: >... > - We have been discussing that issue for two months now without any > clear result, it still is that some people want it, some don't. > > So, what shall I do? Flip a coin? No. It's really simple: Because a) there is no clear preferfe

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Status of .docX etc.

2011-12-14 Thread Olav Dahlum
On 14/12/11 11:27, Harold Fuchs wrote: > > "e-letter" wrote in message > news:CAET1fe6jeCR1769v-0yaDhUMw78v0pH4P2O+0T1jeg9B8=e...@mail.gmail.com... >> On 13/12/2011, Harold Fuchs wrote: >>> Would someone please either explain or point me at a detailed >>> explanation of >>> the current status of

Re: [tdf-discuss] Status of .docX etc.

2011-12-14 Thread Olav Dahlum
On 14/12/11 10:21, e-letter wrote: > On 13/12/2011, Harold Fuchs wrote: >> Would someone please either explain or point me at a detailed explanation of >> the current status of LO vis à vis the "new" MS office document formats >> docx, xlsx etc. >> > > Here we go again: please explain why you ca

Re: [tdf-discuss] overall communication guidelines and reply-to mangling

2011-12-14 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hello, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2011-12-14 23:56: So go ahead! Enjoy the impact You might cause. Enjoy counting corpses. Corpse's Bride is a nice movie, but I guess you are not talking about it. ;-) So, my point is the following: - I have people strongly asking for disabling reply-to

Re: [tdf-discuss] overall communication guidelines and reply-to mangling

2011-12-14 Thread Friedrich Strohmaier
Hi Florian, *, Am 12.12.2011 14:41 schrieb Florian Effenberger: > Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2011-12-11 15:22: >> So well, I've some questions: >> - What makes the website list more suitable for this test than this one? >> - What are the criteria making this test successful or fail? > nothing

Re: [tdf-discuss] RE: Can't get LibreOffice to compile (dev-install)

2011-12-14 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi John, gptscorp schrieb: Thanks for the reply. I included it in the PATH variable. Now I am getting this error after I do a "make dev-install": /usr/bin/sh: D:/git/libo/solver/wntmsci12.pro/bin/ulfconv: No such file or directory Any thoughts. No. I do not use that. I build with make bui

[tdf-discuss] RE: Can't get LibreOffice to compile (dev-install)

2011-12-14 Thread gptscorp
Thanks for the reply. I included it in the PATH variable. Now I am getting this error after I do a "make dev-install": /usr/bin/sh: D:/git/libo/solver/wntmsci12.pro/bin/ulfconv: No such file or directory Any thoughts. Thanks Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:22:28 -0800 From: ml-node+s969070n3586318.

[tdf-discuss] Re: Status of .docX etc.

2011-12-14 Thread Harold Fuchs
"e-letter" wrote in message news:CAET1fe6jeCR1769v-0yaDhUMw78v0pH4P2O+0T1jeg9B8=e...@mail.gmail.com... On 13/12/2011, Harold Fuchs wrote: Would someone please either explain or point me at a detailed explanation of the current status of LO vis à vis the "new" MS office document formats doc

Re: [tdf-discuss] Status of .docX etc.

2011-12-14 Thread Jean Milot
Hello, I would like to know if all these formats are associated with LO when we install it. I have installed the last version ( .deb on Ubuntu 10.04) and i have ods etc associated with LO but not .docx xls How i can make this association for all the users on my server ? Thanks for you

Re: [tdf-discuss] RE: Can't get LibreOffice to compile (dev-install)

2011-12-14 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi John, gptscorp schrieb: hello, I am still having problems getting ANT to work. Any suggestions? I have downloaded and unzipped the zipfile, installed ?? There is nothing to 'install' but only to unpack. it and have the included it on the autogen line.I still cannot get it to work. Than

[tdf-discuss] RE: Can't get LibreOffice to compile (dev-install)

2011-12-14 Thread gptscorp
hello, I am still having problems getting ANT to work. Any suggestions? I have downloaded and unzipped the zipfile, installed it and have the included it on the autogen line.I still cannot get it to work. Thanks From: gptsc...@hotmail.com To: ml-node+s969070n358526...@n3.nabble.com Subject: R

[tdf-discuss] RE: Can't get LibreOffice to compile (dev-install)

2011-12-14 Thread gptscorp
Thanks for your help, I'll keep you informed. John Grace Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 04:08:17 -0800 From: ml-node+s969070n358526...@n3.nabble.com To: gptsc...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Can't get LibreOffice to compile (dev-install) Hi John, gptscorp schrieb: > Hello, > > I have followed

Re: [tdf-discuss] Status of .docX etc.

2011-12-14 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2011-12-13 3:11 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote: On 13/12/2011 14:43, Harold Fuchs wrote: Can LO read/import these formats for *editing*? All of them? If not, which? Yes, all of them. Can LO write/export these formats? All of them? If not, which? Yes, all of them, although - given the immense

Re: [tdf-discuss] Can't get LibreOffice to compile (dev-install)

2011-12-14 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi John, gptscorp schrieb: Hello, I have followed the instructions on http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/developers/ several times and get all types of quirky messages, and no matter what I do the build do succeed. What am I doing wrong? In help/suggestions are appreciated. I am building

Re: [tdf-discuss] Can't get LibreOffice to compile (dev-install)

2011-12-14 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 15:44 -0800, gptscorp wrote: > Hello, > > I have followed the instructions on > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/developers/ several times and get > all types of quirky messages, and no matter what I do the build do succeed. > What am I doing wrong? In help/suggestio

Re: [tdf-discuss] Status of .docX etc.

2011-12-14 Thread e-letter
On 13/12/2011, Harold Fuchs wrote: > Would someone please either explain or point me at a detailed explanation of > the current status of LO vis à vis the "new" MS office document formats > docx, xlsx etc. > Here we go again: please explain why you can't afford to buy m$??? Have you written to