> The major problem with that as far as I can see is that there is NO
> RECORD ANYWHERE of the emails sent by that process.
> Surely in the days of Sarbanes-Oxley and other legislation that is an
> appalling omission?
If you represent a major company for which stuff like this is important, and
y
Pedro gmail.com> writes:
> In my opinion TDF and LibreOffice should abandon the MS compiler and support
> the switch to MinGW which has already been started by Jan Holesovsky (aka
> Kendy)
Actually the work to support MinGW was started already back in Sun/Oracle OOo
times, and then continued for
Here is a report I wrote after working on x64 Windows LO compilation
during Novell Hack Week back in February. No further work has been
done. Everything done is in git.
I worked on making LibreOffice build as x64 (AMD64) code on Windows. I
used the same compiler suite as normally when building cur
Karl Behler ipp.mpg.de> writes:
> What I know from other platforms (Solaris/Linux) is that autosave saves
> into a hidden file in the background not destroying your last saved
> document.
You are confusing autosave as implemented in random applications (including OOo
and LO) for a long time, a
> Send me a link to a build and a test scenario
That would be fairly pointless, as I don't have interest currently in working on
it any more anyway. I can send the patch to anybody interested, though.
--tml
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? h
> E.g. I know it doesn't really matter to the devs that a user can no longer
> load a docx document which contains an OLE object because docx is from the
> evil MS.
You do?
You are barking up the wrong tree here. I have not seen any actual developers
use language like "evil MS" or "M$" and argume
> Do you think these features could be tested in a development build ???
Read my first reply in this thread. The little experimentation I did is
certainly not good enough to be committed.
--tml
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.lib
> Wouldnt that require us to migrate from the current 10.4 sdk which
> everything is built against to the latest 10.7 in regards to API's?
Not necessarily. This is not a technical list, so this will probably make the
eyes glaze over for most readers, but still:
As long as only calling new instan
Larry Gusaas gmail.com> writes:
> When will LibreOffice add support for using the Versions,
> Full-Screen mode, and Resume features in Mac OS X version 10.7 Lion ?
When somebody writes the code. (And offers it for inclusion under the
license(s) we use.)
> NeoOffice already supports these feat
> So here is my suggestion: I propose the everyone here head over to the
> Apache Incubator and join the proposal as an initial member.
Well, at least for me the problem is:
I *work* on LibreOffice. I f I wasn't paid to do it, I doubt I would touch it.
Or maybe I would, hard to know. As far as
> But can't it simply say RC2 somewhere so that *USERS* KNOW which version
> they have?
Think harder. The point is that if a Release Candidate build is determined to be
good *enough* to be released, the *exact* *same* *bits* will become the release
then instead. Just the names of the download dire
plino gmail.com> writes:
> From my limited knowledge I would say the ODF add-in is still open source
> (but seems to be abandoned).
>
> http://odf-converter.sourceforge.net/
>
> In my opinion it would be strategic to TDF (in colaboration with OASIS) to
> revive this project.
Please no. We who
(Note that I am not subscribed to the discuss list, and I don't intend to
subscribe, so please Cc: me in replies explicitly.)
> 1. The file named as "msvc90.dll" appears wrong. I believe that it
> should be "msvcm90.dll", with that second "m" in the file name.
Or msvcr90.dll. But both msvcr90.d
> I have collected some features enteprises will love to have implemented
> in LibreOffice and listed them in
>
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Crazy_Ideas#Features_Enterprises_Will_Love_To_Have_Implemented
Great, but why is this on the Crazy Ideas page? Those are far from crazy
Great! Just one thought, would we want the ohloh statistics for LibreOffice
to include the history of ooo-build / go-oo and OpenOffice.org, too? I
mean, after all, the bulk of the source code is from OpenOffice.org. No
idea how reliable a picture ohloh has of OO.o history, but on the other
hand, o
15 matches
Mail list logo
