Re: [slim] Significance of "SHOCKER V2"?

2007-04-29 Thread kdf
On 29-Apr-07, at 6:39 PM, Marc Sherman wrote: > kdf wrote: >> There was a little bit of code that went into svn about 9 months >> before >> the Transporter announcement >> but it got very little notice (I can recall only one post asking about >> something called 'shocker'). That's the only stor

Re: [slim] Significance of "SHOCKER V2"?

2007-04-29 Thread Marc Sherman
kdf wrote: > There was a little bit of code that went into svn about 9 months before > the Transporter announcement > but it got very little notice (I can recall only one post asking about > something called 'shocker'). That's the only story I can tell. Seriously? C'mon, Sean, can't you lift th

Re: [slim] Significance of "SHOCKER V2"?

2007-04-29 Thread kdf
On 29-Apr-07, at 4:59 PM, Mark Lanctot wrote: > > Is there an amusing story behind this? I know the display uses high > frequency AC, that could tickle stray fingers even at low voltages. > :-) > shocker was the name of a new player model (presumably just a 'project name' for Transporter) There

[slim] Significance of "SHOCKER V2"?

2007-04-29 Thread Mark Lanctot
The PC board that connects to the Transporter displays, and I believe the Squeezebox display as well, is named "SHOCKER V2" or some sort of version number (V1.2?) Is there an amusing story behind this? I know the display uses high frequency AC, that could tickle stray fingers even at low voltage