RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CFUnited Report - Adobe Keynote

2008-06-18 Thread John Mason
But that's pretty much what they are talking about and it's how AS3 handles it. I can't see why they would implement it differently. John Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770.337.8363 www.FusionLink.com - ColdFusion and Flex hosting Now offering VPS Plans running with VMware technology Now offering Cold

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CFUnited Report - Adobe Keynote

2008-06-18 Thread Cameron Childress
No, if it follows the pattern seen in AS3, it would be something like this... Given a property definition like this: [] You'd get two implicit getters/setters with the signature getFirstname(void):String and setFirstname(String):void Access would be controlled by a combination of access l

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CFUnited Report - Adobe Keynote

2008-06-18 Thread Steven Ross
I can see a reason to have auto generated getters and setters based on a database table (and possibly typed) but you can effectivley do this now with a missing method handler... I'm guessing this is based on a table somewhere? On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[ACFUG Discuss] Oracle + JDBC

2008-06-18 Thread Cameron Childress
Anyone out there have good experience configuring some of the more advanced JDBC options for a CF - Oracle Cluster connection? ...and the time to help out with it? (and get paid for your time) Email me @ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Cameron -- Cameron Childress Sumo Consulting Inc http://www.sumoc.com -

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CFUnited Report - Adobe Keynote

2008-06-18 Thread Cameron Childress
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Dean H. Saxe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I would want to is annotate the properties to say whether the > getter/setter should be autogenerated, that way it leaves control to the > developer. If you don't want it autogenerated, just call it private. It's not

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CFUnited Report - Adobe Keynote

2008-06-18 Thread Dean H. Saxe
What I would want to is annotate the properties to say whether the getter/setter should be autogenerated, that way it leaves control to the developer. I like the idea of the addition of a roles check for authorization to call specific setters/getters. Also, is the autogenerated setter/gett

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CFUnited Report - Adobe Keynote

2008-06-18 Thread Cameron Childress
These sorts of questions are why people participate in alpha/beta programs. These are all points which should be brought up and aired out WAY before the final bits ship. Some thoughts come to mind 1) Add "access" attributes to cfproperty for public/private 2) Add "roles" attribute for author

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CFUnited Report - Adobe Keynote

2008-06-18 Thread Dean H. Saxe
I should say beyond having to implement your own setters/getters... which still doesn't really solve the problem of properties which you explicitly do not want setters/getters on unless you throw exceptions on the unimplemented ones. Yuck. -dhs Dean H. Saxe, CISSP, CEH [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CFUnited Report - Adobe Keynote

2008-06-18 Thread Dean H. Saxe
Which of course sucks if you want encapsulation and limits on the setters/getters based on authorization. Is this controllable in some manner? -dhs Dean H. Saxe, CISSP, CEH [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Free speech exercised both individually and through a free press, is a necessity in any country

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CFUnited Report - Adobe Keynote

2008-06-18 Thread Gurevich, Gerry (NIH/NIEHS) [C]
What if you have already written your own framework to use the cfproperty tag for this very thing? I guess I'll have to wait and see. Gerry Gurevich Application Development NIEHS ITSS Contractor Lockheed Martin Information Technology 919-361-5444 ext 311 ---

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CFUnited Report - Adobe Keynote

2008-06-18 Thread Cameron Childress
I also saw that CF will now be FREE for academic use, including Enterprise. That's fantastic. Very very cool. -Cameron On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Douglas Knudsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Implicit getters/setters > The cfproperty will generate the implicit getters and setters on the

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CFUnited Report - Adobe Keynote

2008-06-18 Thread John Mason
Yes, so if you have your own getters/setters then CF will use those. If they are not present, then the implicit ones will take effect. I can only imagine how much code this will save everyone from typing. John Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770.337.8363 www.FusionLink.com - ColdFusion and Flex hostin

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CFUnited Report - Adobe Keynote

2008-06-18 Thread Douglas Knudsen
"Implicit getters/setters The cfproperty will generate the implicit getters and setters on the backend to save you from writing the code." nice! Was overriding mentioned for these? DK On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:28 AM, John Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just posted my notes from the keyn

[ACFUG Discuss] CFUnited Report - Adobe Keynote

2008-06-18 Thread John Mason
I just posted my notes from the keynote this morning at my blog, www.codfusion.com The keynote covered a lot of new features coming in the next release of Coldfusion. John Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770.337.8363 www.FusionLink.com - ColdFusion and Flex hosting Now offering VPS Plans running with VM