27, 2006 9:22 AMTo: discussion@acfug.orgSubject: Re: Re: [ACFUG
Discuss] Client? Session?In general it seems to me that the rule is that once a user is on
a server, they are on the same server. Define complex data.
I potentially see structures and possibly an occasio
you say Don't use the Client
scope!?
Thanks,
Allen
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeremy AllenSent:
Saturday, September 30, 2006 12:30 AMTo:
discussion@acfug.orgSubject: Re: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Client?
Session?Don't use
: Saturday, September 30, 2006 12:30 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Client? Session?
Don't use the Client scope! There are only a few reasons to use Client
scope and I would still think long and hard about it after having maintained
an application that was almost
- From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeremy Allen Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 12:30 AM To:
discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Client? Session? Don't use the Client scope! There are only a few reasons to use Client scope and I would
,
Allen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Jeremy Allen
Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 12:30 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Client? Session?
Don't use the Client scope! There are only
Wednesday, September
27, 2006 9:22 AMTo: discussion@acfug.orgSubject: Re: Re:
[ACFUG Discuss] Client? Session?In general it seems to me that the rule is that once a user is on a
server, they are on the same server. Define complex data. I
potentially see structures and possibly an occasio
Steven Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/26/2006 08:04 PM
Please respond to
discussion@acfug.org
To
discussion@acfug.org
cc
Subject
Re: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Client? Session?
Yeah it depends on how you want your requests routed...
it is my
understanding
.
Allen
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, September
27, 2006 9:22 AMTo: discussion@acfug.orgSubject: Re: Re:
[ACFUG Discuss] Client? Session?In general it seems to me that the rule is that once
:04 PM
Please respond to
discussion@acfug.org
To
discussion@acfug.org
cc
Subject
Re: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Client? Session?
Yeah it depends on how you want your requests routed...
it is my
understanding that if you want the machines to round robin each
request then you need to do
t supports the equivalent of a session state
server.
Allen
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, September
27, 2006 9:22 AMTo: discussion@acfug.orgSubject: Re: Re:
[ACFUG Discuss] Client? Session?
I'm a little confused as to what scope
of variables to use in our situation. We have a primary server and
a 'backup' server in case the primary fails. Now that is the current
situation. Eventually the backup will be replaced with a better machine
and the load will be balanced a little more
Are you looking to store complex data in your shared scope? If so, you need some sort of sticky session solution. If you are looking to store simple data, using the datasource option of client variable storeage would make it easier to switch over between servers.
TeddyOn 9/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah it depends on how you want your requests routed... it is my
understanding that if you want the machines to round robin each
request then you need to do client variables, if you don't care and
you just want users to stay on one server then you can use sessions.
On 9/26/06, Teddy Payne [EMAIL
13 matches
Mail list logo