- Original Message -
From: "John Dakos"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 6:57 PM
Subject: RE: [pfSense-discussion] article: Millions of Home Routers at Risk
Re pf.jpg can someone clarify what a Yes in the right column represents please:
a) Yes the router was successful in prevent
Hi
I need to give public SSH access to a box for a remote chap who does not have a
static IP. I may be able to give him a PPTP user
account connecting to the specified boxes IP. Boxes IP's are assigned using
DHCP server.
I wish to maintain my security(!) The box he is getting access to is a
Hi
Is anyone else getting this?
It is occurring if you get a either a
1) divide by zero error on the index page for CPU Usage or
2) an indication the CPU is always on 0% use, which it shouldn't be for long!
It seems to occur 1.2.2 onwards and on some motherboards and not others.
It is particul
No Worries Adrian,
I am confident I won't be the only one to benefit, thank you.
Kind regards
David
- Original Message -
From: "Adrian Wenzel"
To:
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 6:22 AM
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)
My apologies, I meant Network layer, n
all.
Kind regards
David
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Buechler"
To:
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2.2 CPU Division by zero error in index.php
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Tortise wrote:
> Hi
>
> In the index.php p
Hi
In the index.php page CPU usage value I am getting:
Warning: Division by zero in /usr/local/www/includes/functions.inc.php on line
66 0%
This is with the embedded image on a CF, Pentium 400, 756M RAM.
If I can assist further please let me know.
Kind regards
David
ld be appreciated please.
Kind regards
David
- Original Message -
From: "Tortise"
To:
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)
Hi Adrian
Thank you so much for your response.
I think those numbers do have something to do w
Apologies for the repeat post, ISP email problem seemed to have lost it, then
later on spat it out
(Not sure if you guys want yet another email to explain!?)
Kind regards
David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussion-unsubscr...
5.128.0.0, or /9 (assuming you really need all
those IPs on each network). That will correct
differentiate the subnets and allow routing to occur ;)
We can get into separating your LANs to disallow your desired access after this
is working.
Thanks,
Adrian
- Original Message -
From: "T
5.128.0.0, or /9 (assuming you really need all
those IPs on each network). That will correct
differentiate the subnets and allow routing to occur ;)
We can get into separating your LANs to disallow your desired access after this
is working.
Thanks,
Adrian
- Original Message -
F
Hi
I have been trying to setup a WAN and two LAN. (3 NIC's)
I want LAN1 to be able to access LAN2 but not the other way around. The idea
is that LAN1 is less public than LAN2.
i.e. visitors can connect to the "Public" LAN2 and browse the Internet etc
while not having any access to LAN1
LAN
Hi
Re the WAN option "Block private networks", When set, this option blocks
traffic from IP addresses that are reserved for private
networks as per RFC 1918 (10/8, 172.16/12, 192.168/16) as well as loopback
addresses (127/8). You should generally leave this option
turned on, unless your WAN net
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] ARP traffic causing routers to hang - single
ARP cache with both LAN and WAN ARP entries?
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Tortise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The pain you refer to is close to the same, howeve
rom: "Bill Marquette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 9:50 AM
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] ARP traffic causing routers to hang - single
ARP cache with both LAN and WAN ARP entries?
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Tortise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Yes I am using 192.168.0.0/24
I have no devices from those manufacturers.
This was not the response I wanted to hear, changing the LAN is a major(!)
Can you clarify the nature of the pfSense ARP cache? Is it relevant? (I am
not convinced that it is - either the ARP packet is
correct or it is
Sense-discussion] ARP traffic causing routers to hang - ingle
ARP cache with both LAN and WAN ARP entries?
Tortise wrote:
> kernel: arp: unknown hardware address format (0x)
> kernel: arp: unknown hardware address format (0xdd1f)
> kernel: arp: 192.168.0.7 is on em1 but got reply from 00:
Hi
I am still tracking down issues on our cable network here. (See previous old
posts - its getting better!)
We seem to be getting an issue with rogue ARP data, for example LAN addresses
getting replies from the WAN side, as logged, for
example:
kernel: arp: unknown hardware address format (
y, November 10, 2007 5:22 AM
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] php: : Not installing nat reflection rules
for a port range > 500 (1.2-RC2)
You most likely have a port range defined.
Scott
On Nov 9, 2007 2:26 AM, Tortise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Team
I added a rule for MS TS acc
Hi Team
I added a rule for MS TS access to 3389, I get logged "php: : Not installing
nat reflection rules for a port range > 500" and the connection does not
seem to be created.
I cannot however find a port range > 500 and the port added is a single
port.
Can anyone advise me on this pleas
Hi
In writing a program to run a 5 minute ping / ifconfig rescue (which I think I
may have achieved - appended) I note the cron job
running every 5 minutes
*/5 * * * * root /etc/ping_hosts.sh
/etc/ping_hosts.sh contains:
#!/bin/sh
# pfSense ping helper
# written by Scott Ullrich
# (C)2006 Sc
20 matches
Mail list logo
