Does anyone have any ALIX or Soekris kits that they don't need any more? I'm
currently running pfSense on a dual P3 system at home and its way over-powered
for what I need and I would like to get something that uses a lot less
electricity and would be a lot quieter. I'm looking at getting an A
Heh,
I've got an old Soekris 45xx board, complete with enclosure, but I was
going to use it for the pool area over at the home owners association,
as well as a smattering of WRAP boards littering the office.
now we have a dilemma. :-)
Jim
On Jun 24, 2008, at 2:11 PM, Adam Van Ornum wrote
Adam Van Ornum wrote:
Does anyone have any ALIX or Soekris kits that they don't need any
more? I'm currently running pfSense on a dual P3 system at home and its
way over-powered for what I need and I would like to get something that
one of those new Intel Atom CPU motherboards would be wort
On Jun 25, 2008, at 12:28 AM, Paul Mansfield wrote:
Adam Van Ornum wrote:
Does anyone have any ALIX or Soekris kits that they don't need any
more? I'm currently running pfSense on a dual P3 system at home
and its way over-powered for what I need and I would like to get
something that
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:28:12AM +0100, Paul Mansfield wrote:
> one of those new Intel Atom CPU motherboards would be worth looking at too.
Anyone aware of an affordable system with Nano or at least a C7, with
decent (Intel would be best, but beggars can't be choosers) NICs onboard?
Mini-ITX w
Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:28:12AM +0100, Paul Mansfield wrote:
one of those new Intel Atom CPU motherboards would be worth looking at too.
Anyone aware of an affordable system with Nano or at least a C7, with
decent (Intel would be best, but beggars can't be choosers) NICs
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:14:35 +0100, "Paul Mansfield"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Eugen Leitl wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:28:12AM +0100, Paul Mansfield wrote:
> >
> >> one of those new Intel Atom CPU motherboards would be worth looking at too.
> >
> > Anyone aware of an affordable syste
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 02:14:35PM +0100, Paul Mansfield wrote:
> >Anyone aware of an affordable system with Nano or at least a C7, with
> >decent (Intel would be best, but beggars can't be choosers) NICs onboard?
> >
> >Mini-ITX would be best. But any small brick or 19" 1U form factor
> >ok, too.
I had similar thoughts a while back. doesn't always work out the way you
think. (e.g. toyota prius, while a politically and technologically
needed car, actually saves no energy over it's lifespan due to the
enormous amount of front end manufacturing cost and material used).
Here's what I did.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Andrew Burnette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had similar thoughts a while back. doesn't always work out the way you
> think. (e.g. toyota prius, while a politically and technologically needed
> car, actually saves no energy over it's lifespan due to the enormous a
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Andrew Burnette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had similar thoughts a while back. doesn't always work out the way you
> think. (e.g. toyota prius, while a politically and technologically needed
> car, actually saves no energy over it's lifespan due to the enormous
I find this an interesting argument, but I'd like to see some real
analysis (with numbers), or at least sources.
If you're right, I'm doing it wrong (3 old trucks (2 toyota
landcruisers, one 67 chevy converted to a flatbed) + selling new
computer components).
I don't see much evidence (in
t
someone else didn't need any more, since it seems a number of people around
here end up in the opposite situation than me...
> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:28:53 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> discussion@pfsense.com> Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Used ALIX or
&g
Way OT, but hopefully others find it interesting...
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Jim Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I find this an interesting argument, but I'd like to see some real analysis
> (with numbers), or at least sources.
>
> If you're right, I'm doing it wrong (3 old trucks (2
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Adam Van Ornum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I appreciate the ideas (even the car discussion is interesting ;) but I'm
> basically looking for something that will cover pretty decent throughput
> with as low energy usage as possible. Currently I'm on a cable connect
On Jun 27, 2008, at 3:35 PM, David Rees wrote:
Way OT, but hopefully others find it interesting...
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Jim Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I find this an interesting argument, but I'd like to see some real
analysis
(with numbers), or at least sources.
If yo
16 matches
Mail list logo
