Re: [pfSense-discussion] atmel avr port of pfsense?

2007-07-31 Thread jason whitt
I may take a look into this I haven't touched net in a while and could use this as a good excuse to On 7/31/07, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Most of the steps should be the same for NetBSD as they are for FreeBSD > since t

Re: [pfSense-discussion] atmel avr port of pfsense?

2007-07-31 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 7/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Most of the steps should be the same for NetBSD as they are for FreeBSD since > they share a lot of commonalities. Not quite. You will find a lot of items that rely on netgraph such as PPTP, PPPoE, etc. Scott

Re: [pfSense-discussion] atmel avr port of pfsense?

2007-07-31 Thread youshi10
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, jason whitt wrote: I'd be intrested in seeing a net port let me know if any help is needed On 7/31/07, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] This looks like a job for NetBSD! Good luck porting pfSense t

Re: [pfSense-discussion] atmel avr port of pfsense?

2007-07-31 Thread jason whitt
I'd be intrested in seeing a net port let me know if any help is needed On 7/31/07, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip] > > This looks like a job for NetBSD! > > Good luck porting pfSense to Net! :) > > Scott >

Re: [pfSense-discussion] atmel avr port of pfsense?

2007-07-31 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 7/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > This looks like a job for NetBSD! Good luck porting pfSense to Net! :) Scott

Re: [pfSense-discussion] atmel avr port of pfsense?

2007-07-31 Thread youshi10
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Chris Buechler wrote: Paul M wrote: http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS2837651365.html "32MB of SDRAM and 16MB of flash, expandable via an SD-card slot." aside from the fact that those two numbers alone mean it's far from compatible, it's not an x86 system, it's RISC.

Re: [pfSense-discussion] atmel avr port of pfsense?

2007-07-31 Thread Chris Buechler
Paul M wrote: http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS2837651365.html "32MB of SDRAM and 16MB of flash, expandable via an SD-card slot." aside from the fact that those two numbers alone mean it's far from compatible, it's not an x86 system, it's RISC. It won't run m0n0wall either.

Re: [pfSense-discussion] atmel avr port of pfsense?

2007-07-31 Thread Roeland Struijk
Hi, take a look at http://www.pfsense.com/index.php?id=43 You'll see that you need a minimam of 128mb ram, and even 128mb of storage on Flash or whatever. Good luck. Roeland 2007/7/31, Paul M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS2837651365.html > "32MB of SDRAM and 16MB of fl

Re: [pfSense-discussion] atmel avr port of pfsense?

2007-07-31 Thread RB
On 7/31/07, Paul M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "32MB of SDRAM and 16MB of flash, expandable via an SD-card slot." Likely not. This is specced about the same as the Soekris 4501-30, which used to be enough but not any more. I think m0n0 would do okay, though. That, or another minimalist distro,

[pfSense-discussion] atmel avr port of pfsense?

2007-07-31 Thread Paul M
http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS2837651365.html "32MB of SDRAM and 16MB of flash, expandable via an SD-card slot." is this a powerful enough board to run a minimal pfsense system?