On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> However, I'm also willing to admit that personal preference is a
> factor here. We may just need to push this up for a BDFL judgement. I
> would certainly prefer module level definitions, but at the end of the
>
The undcoumented scanner class in the regex module may interest you:
http://code.activestate.com/recipes/457664/
Alex
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 3:32 AM, SmileyChris wrote:
> Because that link intrigued me, I challenged myself to write my own
> generic lexer & parser based on
Because that link intrigued me, I challenged myself to write my own
generic lexer & parser based on what I had read:
http://gist.github.com/250128
On Dec 6, 2:07 pm, Luke Plant wrote:
> On Saturday 05 December 2009 20:09:21 Luke Plant wrote:
>
> > I'm not likely to able