On 07/04/2017 07:04 AM, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> Have DB backends understand certain field types expressed as strings
> ("varchar", "text", "blob", "decimal" and so on).
>
> Possibly some backends could implement a wider set than the others
> ("json", "xml", "rasterimage" etc.).
>
> Have each
YouTube videos of
U.S. Congress money laundering hearing
of
Saudi Billionaire " Maan Al sanea"
with *bank of America*
and The owner of Saad Hospital and Schools
in the Eastern Province in *Saudi Arabia*
and the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Awal Bank in *Bahrain*
>
> Have each Field class deconstruct to a field name and params [...]
Thanks, @patrys. A field deconstruction is a key to achieve what I tried to
describe earlier.
We can discuss the details about implementation, but this is not important
now.
Marcin
--
You received this message
W dniu piątek, 23 czerwca 2017 21:28:07 UTC+2 użytkownik Andrew Godwin
napisał:
>
>
>>
>> The advantages comes from db type independency, this is true, but in the
>> other side you're including the app layer dependency.
>>
>> Let's imagine that one of builtin field will change it's definition.
