Hi Anssi,
creating queryset first and reusing it later is a nice idea and I'll
add it to my tests, but unfortunately it works only when you can share
this queryset between db requests, which is impossible in case of
multiply simultaneously requests to server. For example, if you show
some profile d
Thanks Jacob, I will continue testing and report if something new on
this issue comes out.
On Aug 6, 3:50 am, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:14 PM, OverKrik wrote:
> > Hi Jeremy, I will release all my code after finishing the test suite -
> > I think, i
Hi Jeremy, I will release all my code after finishing the test suite -
I think, in about 2 weeks.
On Aug 6, 2:59 am, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:32 PM, OverKrik wrote:
> > I am performing every test 10 times, excluding one fastest and one
> > slowest result
t confused, does this mean that only() and defer() should
not be used in single-item pk queries?
On Aug 6, 1:34 am, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 5:32 PM, OverKrik wrote:
> > I am performing every test 10 times, excluding one fastest and one
> > slowest result, res
I am performing every test 10 times, excluding one fastest and one
slowest result, restarting db every time and performing 10 000 request
to warm db before measuring execution time.
Just in case, I've tried running tests in only-full-only-full and
defer-full-defer-full patters and got same results.
:09 am, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:44 PM, OverKrik wrote:
> > Hi, I am testing performance of three querysets
>
> Good! We need as many benchmarks as we can get our hands on.
>
> > I was expecting first two querysets to be faster, but for some reaso
Hi, I am testing performance of three querysets
1.
for pk in xrange(1,5):
user = User.objects.only("power_level").get(pk = pk)
d = user.power_level
2.
for pk in xrange(1,5):
user = User.objects.defer("name","email","age","info").get(pk
= pk)
d = user
Jacob, thank you for an excellent explanation.
On Jul 31, 7:36 pm, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 7:20 AM, OverKrik wrote:
> > Hi, I am not having any memory leaks, just checking how much memory
> > every part of django use out of interest.(And because
--
> cat /etc/apache2/apache2.conf
>
> Mysql
> ==
> Configuration
> --
> cat /etc/mysql/my.cnf
>
> 2010/7/31 OverKrik :
>
>
>
>
>
> > Nope, I am testing Django memory usage for different kind of objects,
> > and
is this actually trying to test? If Python allocation works?
>
> Yes, you'll start getting all sort of weird memory usage patterns from
> the Python VM if you hold references to 10 bogus objects without
> garbage collecting in-between.
>
> On 30 jul, 21:04, OverKrik w
for python dicts. You would see this for any pytho obj with the
> right number of fields.
>
> Alex
>
> On Jul 30, 2010 7:17 PM, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:59 PM, OverKrik wrote:
> > Hi, I've been profiling Djan...
>
>
xrange(10)]
and I am using "ps -eo cmd,pcpu,rss" to check memory usage and running
this code from manage.py command.
As soon as I add name4 memory usage became 2X.
On Jul 31, 3:17 am, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:59 PM, OverKrik wrote:
> > Hi, I'
Oh, and I am using latest Django svn but can reproduce this with 1.1
too
On Jul 31, 3:17 am, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:59 PM, OverKrik wrote:
> > Hi, I've been profiling Django to see how much overhead is being added
> > by ORM, and found a very st
(max_length = 255, blank = False)
uncommenting this doubles used memory
On Jul 31, 2:59 am, OverKrik wrote:
> Hi, I've been profiling Django to see how much overhead is being added
> by ORM, and found a very strange case of memory usage(which is either
> some kind of bug or me misunderstan
Hi, I've been profiling Django to see how much overhead is being added
by ORM, and found a very strange case of memory usage(which is either
some kind of bug or me misunderstanding low level stuff) - as long as
I have 0 to 3 fields of any type - memory usage is around 45MB ( I
create list of 100 00
47 am, Ramiro Morales wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 6:25 AM, OverKrik wrote:
>
> > Hello, I am working on heavy-AJAX-based website and use firebug alot
> > to check responces from server, in case of 500 error Django sends full
> > 500 page which is not very easy to use
t; On May 8, 2009, at 11:25, OverKrik wrote:
>
> > Hello, I am working on heavy-AJAX-based website and use firebug alot
> > to check responces from server, in case of 500 error Django sends full
> > 500 page which is not very easy to use. I've made a simple patch to
> >
Hello, I am working on heavy-AJAX-based website and use firebug alot
to check responces from server, in case of 500 error Django sends full
500 page which is not very easy to use. I've made a simple patch to
provide light version of 500 page in case of ajax request.
I know that everybody is in ru
18 matches
Mail list logo
