John R Levine writes:
> Again, Murray and I don't need them but other proposals do.
OK, FWIW, I'm only interested in your proposals at the moment. :-)
Thanks for the courteous response; I didn't entirely deserve it.
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull
wrote:
> TPA is still on the table for other 3rd party services (invoicing etc),
> because conditional signatures do nothing for them.
>
I suggest that TPA or ATPS are way too complicated for third party services
like invoicing, because in tha
Stop exaggerating. It is not the case that anywhere near 100% of list
managers actually *need* doodads, although a few (covering less than
1% of recipients, I bet) do need them, and many find them attractive.
Well, now we're back to arbitrarily close to 100% of list managers can
live with rewr
John R Levine writes:
> We have lists where we would be unhappy if the added stuff went away,
> e.g., a line at the front reminding people that the messages are private
> and not to be forwarded.
OK, so that's new harm done by this behavior. On some such lists it
might be mitigated by the f