Normally I'm not a stickler for avoiding side discussion of related items
on working lists. But this case I'm going to have to agree with Dave: This
group is not making sufficient progress on its core work, which currently
is to review and progress the ARC specifications. This needs to happen
> What's the best way to proceed from here for the working group?
That's easy: The way to proceed is by describing the actual interoperability
problem that came up. In detail.
What you have done so far, AFAICT, is propose a change that at most facilities
a type of testing decades of experience
