Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC exceptions

2024-03-15 Thread Hector Santos
Doug, since of dawn of electronic messaging, a system local policy always prevails. When implementing the new SMTP filters such as SPF, the more powerful policy was one of detecting failure. The PASS meant nothing since it may not pre-empt any other checking. For us, wcSPF was the exception in

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC exceptions

2024-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, March 15, 2024 10:15:55 AM EDT Todd Herr wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 1:47 AM Douglas Foster < > > dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote: > > DMARC is an imperfect tool, as evidenced by the mailing list problem, > > among others. DMARCbis has failed to integrate RFC7489 with R

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC exceptions

2024-03-15 Thread Todd Herr
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 1:47 AM Douglas Foster < dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote: > DMARC is an imperfect tool, as evidenced by the mailing list problem, > among others. DMARCbis has failed to integrate RFC7489 with RFC 7960, > because it provides no discussion of the circumstances whe

[dmarc-ietf] DMARC exceptions

2024-03-14 Thread Douglas Foster
DMARC is an imperfect tool, as evidenced by the mailing list problem, among others. DMARCbis has failed to integrate RFC7489 with RFC 7960, because it provides no discussion of the circumstances where an evaluator should override the DMARC result. I believe DMARCbis needs a discussion about the a