Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback

2014-11-16 Thread Evan Hunt
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 02:28:19PM -0800, Tim Wicinski wrote: > In case I wasn't clear enough, the chairs will accept all the emails > supporting the CfA from warren's previous email, so you'll not need to > resend. I can't remember if I already said I supported adoption. If so, I support adopti

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback

2014-11-16 Thread Evan Hunt
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 03:12:58PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > Before commenting further I'd love the authors to flesh > out their reasoning for not simply slaving the zone where possible. I'm not one of the authors, but I can give you an answer: in BIND, and I believe in other DNS implementations

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback

2014-11-16 Thread Doug Barton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/16/14 1:45 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote: | | This starts a Call for Adoption for | draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback I have read the draft, I support its adoption, and I will review and contribute text as necessary. It should come as no surprise t

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback

2014-11-16 Thread Tim Wicinski
Hi In case I wasn't clear enough, the chairs will accept all the emails supporting the CfA from warren's previous email, so you'll not need to resend. thanks tim On 11/16/14 1:45 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote: This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback The draft is av

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback

2014-11-16 Thread John Levine
>Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption >by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. Yes, I think the WG should adopt it. It has some editorial issues, and perhaps should explain why it doesn't allow, e.g., root on the same LAN rather than onl

[DNSOP] Call for Adoption draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback

2014-11-16 Thread Tim Wicinski
This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback The draft is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback/ Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating yo

Re: [DNSOP] "Secure Unowned Hierarchical Anycast Root Name Service - And an Apologia" (circleid)

2014-11-16 Thread Warren Kumari
On Friday, November 14, 2014, Wolfgang Nagele (AusRegistry) < wolfgang.nag...@ausregistry.com.au> wrote: > Hi, > > AS112 absolutely proves that unowned anycast can work at scale; that's > not > my concern. But if my neighbor announces a route to the AS112 addresses, > and then misconfigures a