--gxnQqCMJOKyxv5fW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:53:53AM -0600, Jeff Biss wrote:
> Here's my 2 cents:
>=20
> I see no reason that a procedure should be a child of a paragraph. The=20
>
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:42:01AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> currently, a key cap is written as x. this
> seems to suggest that a keycap is, by default, of type "literal",
> if i can call it that. and its content is "x". so far, so good?
> (one might even go as far as to suggest that t
With DocBook XSL 1.58.1, and $default.encoding set to 'UTF-8', chunked
HTML output comes out with its encoding set to 'ISO-8859-1'. Setting
$chunker.output.encoding to 'UTF-8' works around the problem, but why
is $default.encoding ignored?
Tim.
*/
msg03481/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signatu
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 04:33:36PM -0400, Aravind Vinnakota wrote:
> I am using docbook on a Solaris machine until now. I am wondering
> whether there is any documentation on setting up docbook support on a
> Redhat 7.3 machine. I am looking for documentation where the packages are
> installed
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 04:18:05AM +, Karif Battle wrote:
> The Company has decided to use DocBooks and XML.
>
> Problems:
>
> The docbook2man utility does not handle XML properly.
Indeed: for nroff output from XML, better to use db2man, an improved
version of which is included in the xmlt
--nDAeJifZeokOLf48
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:31:22AM -0500, Norman Walsh wrote:
> / [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michal Sanger) was heard to say:
> | In PHP semantic I have declaration:
> | string MyFunction(string param1, string par
--dicp5grlxus9uUnk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 12:23:40AM +0100, Julio Merino wrote:
> En s=E1b, 2001-11-10 a 23:58, Tim Waugh escribi=F3:
> > I think what you want to do
--AyMxp50UHmBw7FcH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 08:46:52PM +0100, Julio Merino wrote:
> I'm including images in my documents in two formats, EPS and JPG. I
> think that EPS is the forma
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 02:38:20PM +1030, David Lloyd wrote:
[ ]
> Does not render at all using the print modules. It renders when I use
> the html modules.
A bug in the default stylesheet customization included in
docbook-utils, since fixed.
> Also, when I attempted to use v1.73 stylesheets I
--nRwNdQxTdQ7rZk9A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 09:03:25PM -0500, G.L. Grobe wrote:
> So basically, I've got a *.dsl like below. Once I put in my own definitions,
> how do I use this w/ 'db2html myDocbookFile.sgm' so that my chan
--Dnvf+KcI+0MByPWJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 03:48:15PM +0200, Julio Merino wrote:
> Well, I'm writing a chapter about the division of the hard disks, so I
> explain what are the cylinders, the heads, the sectors, etc. I would
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 02:22:32PM -0500, Matthew Braun wrote:
> > Sorry, this document does not validate as HTML 4.01 Strict.
>
> Uh...was there any claim that the stylesheets produced HTML which validated
> as _strict_ HTML 4.01?
Well, the DOCTYPE of the generated HTML. :-)
I see now that
This file (test.sgml):
-->
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
<--
when processed with 'db2html test.sgml' on a Red Hat Linux 7.1 system
produces t1.html, which has the appended errors when validated using
validator.w3.org.
openjade-1.3-13
docbook-style-dsssl-1.64-2
doc
--5UGlQXeG3ziZS81+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 10:58:39AM +0930, David Lloyd wrote:
> >From default RedHat 7.1 distribution with no changes to dbparam.dsl or
> any other settings. When I create my book using db2html which seems
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 02:02:50PM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
> | So the question is:
> | - did Red Hat shipped a wrong (or old/buggy) version ?
>
> Yes. I think so.
Yes, it's an old XML package. Hope to update it soon.
Tim.
*/
--
--FhKpTYimqQF2+bfE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 04:37:19PM +0100, Rune Enggaard Jensen wrote:
> Is there any way we can get this to work?
Yes, but it takes some doing. See
http://people.redhat.com/twaugh/docbook/selfdocbook/>, w
16 matches
Mail list logo