Re: [docbook-apps] db 5, para formatting, fo output

2011-07-25 Thread davep
On 07/25/2011 08:51 PM, Bob Stayton wrote: Hi Dave, The feature is applied only when the link element is empty, when the stylesheet is processing the url attribute to make the displayed link text. I think that is the correct behavior, because the text content of link is arbitrary, and applyin

Re: [docbook-apps] db 5, para formatting, fo output

2011-07-25 Thread Bob Stayton
Hi Dave, The feature is applied only when the link element is empty, when the stylesheet is processing the url attribute to make the displayed link text. I think that is the correct behavior, because the text content of link is arbitrary, and applying the url hyphenation process to arbitrary t

Re: [docbook-apps] db 5, para formatting, fo output

2011-07-25 Thread davep
On 07/25/2011 04:30 PM, Bob Stayton wrote: Hi Dave, The DocBook XSL stylesheets can already insert zero-width spaces for long URLs. See this reference: http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/Ulinks.html#BreakLongUrls Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises b...@sagehill.net Thanks Bob... I think :-)

Re: [docbook-apps] db 5, para formatting, fo output

2011-07-25 Thread Bob Stayton
Hi Dave, The DocBook XSL stylesheets can already insert zero-width spaces for long URLs. See this reference: http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/Ulinks.html#BreakLongUrls Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises b...@sagehill.net - Original Message - From: "davep" To: Sent: Monday, July

Re: [docbook-apps] db 5, para formatting, fo output

2011-07-25 Thread davep
On 07/25/2011 03:41 PM, davep wrote: Attached (if it gets through) the horrible looking result when justification is on and the line includes a url of any length. 1. I'd like to have justified text (param alignment='justified'), but if it contains a url... (Yes, not easy) or 2. How to persuade

Re: [docbook-apps] header.content customization bridgehead problem

2011-07-25 Thread Joy Andree
Thanks Bob, I am using XEP but I noticed different problem. I am at 1.69 and it looks like I need to upgrade to get the code below. It was in the plans but looks like I have a good reason to move it up on the list of things to do. In preliminary testing it looks to be working now. Thanks again,