On 04.02.2008 21:12, Jochen Kaechelin wrote:
what's the prefered way to backup users mail?
i use doevcot shipping with debian/etch an maildir.
thanx
http://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg06254.html
Matt Rude wrote:
Hello, Im having problems getting Dovecot to read the quota info from
MySQL. My current dovecot.conf file is below.
If I run the user_query of:
user_query = SELECT 1000 AS uid, 1000 AS gid, maildir AS home FROM
mailbox WHERE username = '%u' AND active = '1'
Everything works fi
Hello, Im having problems getting Dovecot to read the quota info from
MySQL. My current dovecot.conf file is below.
If I run the user_query of:
user_query = SELECT 1000 AS uid, 1000 AS gid, maildir AS home FROM
mailbox WHERE username = '%u' AND active = '1'
Everything works fine but if I ru
Hi,
Is it possible to change convert plugin, so it would keep old
UIDVALIDITY and UIDNEXT after conversion from mbox to Maildir?
As far as I can tell, this shouldn't be a big problem as this
information already exists in the mbox. Well, at least for mboxes, that
have
that information.
The pr
what's the prefered way to backup users mail?
i use doevcot shipping with debian/etch an maildir.
thanx
--
jochen
It's even documented (somewhere) that NULL value means the same as
if the field wasn't even selected by the query.
Ah, so it is, on
http://wiki.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields> Not sure how
I missed that. Thanks.
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 12:54 -0500, Eric Hester wrote:
> Sorry, now that I reread the comment for listen I see it says space
> separated list. I'm not sure this is clear to everyone that it can be
> used to listen on multiple ports as there are wiki pages showing how
> to use iptables to get additio
also just as a note, when you go to 1.1 make sure to return
nopassword='Y' if you return a NULL password or dovecot will complain
and will fail auth.
On Feb 4, 2008 12:48 PM, WJCarpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> 2. It looks like any value at all for the "proxy" field in the passdb
> >> l
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 09:48 -0800, WJCarpenter wrote:
> >> 2. It looks like any value at all for the "proxy" field in the passdb
> >> lookup turns proxying on. The one exception is a value of NULL for
> >> "proxy", in which case proxying is not turned on and proxy-related
> >> other fields are ig
Sorry, now that I reread the comment for listen I see it says space
separated list. I'm not sure this is clear to everyone that it can be
used to listen on multiple ports as there are wiki pages showing how
to use iptables to get additional ports:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Iptables
The patch worked
2. It looks like any value at all for the "proxy" field in the passdb
lookup turns proxying on. The one exception is a value of NULL for
"proxy", in which case proxying is not turned on and proxy-related
other fields are ignored. Is that how it's intended to work?
Yes. It might change
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 11:40 -0500, Eric Hester wrote:
> Any chance of getting multiple ports per protocol in 1.1 or is that a
> major undertaking?
It should already work:
listen = *:143 *:144 *:145
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Any chance of getting multiple ports per protocol in 1.1 or is that a
major undertaking?
On Feb 4, 2008 4:23 AM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 17:25 -0500, Eric Hester wrote:
> > I got this working using %l for the ip, but I'd really rather do
> > multiple ports
Hello Charles,
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 02:31:04PM -0500, you wrote:
> Don't do this, just provide output of dovecot -n...
O.k., good idea. Here is the output of dovecot -n:
snip
# 1.0.10: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf
protocols: imap imaps pop3
ssl_disable: yes
disable_plaintext_auth: n
Yes, the proxy verifies if that password is correct before forward and I
want to insert a record on sql table if is succesfuly or not.
On one of proxy (/var/log/dovecot.log) I can see:
dovecot: Feb 04 10:31:16 Info: auth(default): client in: AUTH 1
PLAIN service=imapsecured lip=127.0.0.1
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 17:25 -0500, Eric Hester wrote:
> I got this working using %l for the ip, but I'd really rather do
> multiple ports so I don't have to have 4 ips on 16 different machines.
Oh, somehow I wasn't thinking and thought %l was the same as port :)
> I was trying to use the new 1.1
16 matches
Mail list logo
