On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 17:06 +0100, David McBride wrote:
> Is there a mechanism (or relatively small source-code change) which would
> cause
> Dovecot to evaluate IMAP prefixes relative to $HOME rather than the configured
> IMAP root?
It's not really possible to know which part of the string is th
John Doe wrote:
Hi,
I am new to dovecot and I am a bit confused with how
namespaces/prefixes/separators are handled by the clients and dovecot...
I tried to understand the desciption from the conf file but without success.
With each conf I create the following path /f1/f2 on the client (thund
Hi,
I've just completed a migration from Courier to a Dovecot 1.0.7 (patched
RHE 5) which is working great, except for this weirdness of an issue
that is impacting a handful of users. My question is that will turning
off maildir_copy_preserve_filename help or hurt in a situation where
there
Hi,
I've just completed a migration from Courier to a Dovecot 1.0.7 (patched
RHE 5) which is working great, except for this weirdness of an issue
that is impacting a handful of users. My question is that will turning
off maildir_copy_preserve_filename help or hurt in a situation where
there
Hi,
I am new to dovecot and I am a bit confused with how
namespaces/prefixes/separators are handled by the clients and dovecot...
I tried to understand the desciption from the conf file but without success.
With each conf I create the following path /f1/f2 on the client (thunderbird)
and get th
Hi Charles,
I was using this version since it's the one we have installed in 6
servers.
I've solved it, the package pam-devel was not installed a after
installating it the dovecot installation run ok with pam support.
Thanks,
Jorge
On 2008/08/22, at 12:19, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 8/22
Greetings,
Is there a mechanism (or relatively small source-code change) which would cause
Dovecot to evaluate IMAP prefixes relative to $HOME rather than the configured
IMAP root?
* * *
Background:
We're currently migrating from a WU-IMAP mailserver configuration which stores
user mail in a g
Hello,
I'm using dovecot with postfix configured for address extensions, so
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, automatically is
handed off
to dovecot deliver, which sees there is no folder called "folder"
and autocreates it. This is brilliant, as it means I can give out
subject orrien
Hi,
I'm trying to create Shared folder with subfolders "SPAM" and "NOT_Spam".
Configuration:
namespace public {
separator = /
prefix = Shared/
location = maildir:/vmail/%Ld/Shared:INDEX=/vmail/%Ld/%Ln/Shared
hidden = no
}
Result I get (is exactly what I want):
Inbox
Drafts
Sent
Trash
Shared
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Spoke too soon,
I think I have a way to reproduce the error. Here are the steps:
1. Exit out of thunderbird
2. delete mail/.imap folder
3. Restart thunderbird
4. delete a message ( I have setting so that message are moved to Trash
when deleted)
A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timo,
From other posts it seems to be when you are moving message. I have
tried and cannot get it to happen with my account. I tried with
Thunderbird, SquirrellMail, and Mac Mail. Out of 620K of log file lines
the error only occurred 81 times yest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciao,
I'm new to dovecot, just a week into switching over from UW-Imap, so
take my word with caution. We use SpuirrelMail, 1.4.15, and not seeing
any problems. Have you configured your folder defaults with
squirrellMail? Namely Option 1. "Default
On Fre, August 22, 2008 13:01, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> Has noone any idea?
after 1.0.13 i have to change to
$allow_thread_sort= false;
$allow_server_sort= true;
in 1.0.13 i can have both as true
my dovecot namespace is
namespace private {
#separator =
prefix =
#lo
All *appears* to be fine here on Squirrel + Dovecot 1.1 ?
Ed W
Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
Hello!
Has noone any idea?
Ciao,
Gerhard
--
http://www.wiesinger.com/
Hello!
I'm running squirrelmail 1.4.8 (I know this is not the latest vers
On 8/22/2008, Jorge Ruao ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm compiling dovecot 1.0.10 with pam support in SLES 9 but i'm
> getting errors in config.log and it won't compile with pam support.
Why not start with the current version if this is a new install?
--
Best regards,
Charles
Hello!
Has noone any idea?
Ciao,
Gerhard
--
http://www.wiesinger.com/
Hello!
I'm running squirrelmail 1.4.8 (I know this is not the latest version) and know
I'm having troubles with:
1.) Folder list view
2.) Save to sent or Drafts fo
Sorry guys, config issue. All is working like a charm.
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:48:55 +0300, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Dovecot guys!
>
> I want to play with dovecot login processes invoked from inetd
> superserver,
> but cannot run auth worker for postfix sasl and deliver process in th
Hello Dovecot guys!
I want to play with dovecot login processes invoked from inetd superserver,
but cannot run auth worker for postfix sasl and deliver process in this
case.
Any ideas?
WBR, mike
Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
If you can easily test this, I guess the best way would be to find one
which Dovecot v1.0.x version exactly broke this for you (and after that
which hg commit change broke it).
1.0.12 work fine (for now..), i can't try .13 & .14: i've an altered
customer at phone wh
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 11:52 +0200, Mikael Jenkler wrote:
> if it does not exist get_mail_headers returns null or something ?
>
> is this not the best way?
> resiptient = get_mail_headers(mail, "Delivered-To");
>
> is mail a global var ?
Sorry, I don't have time to play this game. You can learn
if it does not exist get_mail_headers returns null or something ?
is this not the best way?
resiptient = get_mail_headers(mail, "Delivered-To");
is mail a global var ?
Regards
/J3nkl3r
Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 11:35 +0200, Mikael Jenkler wrote:
I dont have the old orgi
Hi,
I'm new here in the list so Hello to everyone!
I'm compiling dovecot 1.0.10 with pam support in SLES 9 but i'm getting
errors in config.log and it won't compile with pam support.
Here are the results:
s1:~/dovecot-1.0.10# ./configure --with-pam | grep pam
checking for pam_start in -lpam.
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 11:35 +0200, Mikael Jenkler wrote:
> I dont have the old orginal code anymore :-( only have the modded one
>
> I can try to patch it myself, can you tell me where in what variable you
> have the mail header or mail
> Is it reachable in dspam-exec.c
Just took a quick look,
I dont have the old orginal code anymore :-( only have the modded one
I can try to patch it myself, can you tell me where in what variable you
have the mail header or mail
Is it reachable in dspam-exec.c
I relly want this to work :-)
Regards
/Jenkler
Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-22
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 11:21 +0200, Mikael Jenkler wrote:
> What do you think about the modified plugin, can it be done in the new
> version? what var contains the mail or header?
I haven't even looked at it, since I don't know that old code any more.
If you can send me a diff, then I can maybe ta
What do you think about the modified plugin, can it be done in the new
version? what var contains the mail or header?
Regards
/j3nkl3r
Mikael Jenkler wrote:
The problem is that i dont have it working for the new antispam but
here is your old script with the recipient fixed
This is 100% your co
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 11:15 +0200, Jiri Novosad wrote:
Hi again,
I tried this on Gentoo with dovecot-antispam version 20080601 and
dovecot versions 1.0.15-r1, 1.1.0, 1.1.1 and 1.1.2.
Versions 1.1.0+ all fail.
Version 1.0.15-r1 works fine, even if I add the "Next message
une
27 matches
Mail list logo
